My Efficiency Sucks

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Fattymcphatty, May 23, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Fattymcphatty

    Fattymcphatty Initiate (0) Jul 13, 2014 Michigan

    Oh and post boil was 10 Brix. And I measured the volume in my pot with a stick I notched for every two cups.
     
  2. CurtFromHershey

    CurtFromHershey Initiate (0) Oct 4, 2012 Minnesota

    If possible, I'd recommend giving the grains a good thorough stirring when they're submerged prior to tying the bag off. It's very easy for the grains to form dough balls when confined.
     
    CDennyRun likes this.
  3. inchrisin

    inchrisin Pooh-Bah (2,013) Sep 25, 2008 Indiana
    Pooh-Bah

    Double up on some of your efforts, if you like. You can put half of your grains through the mill a second time. You can stir your grains a second time after 20 or 30 minutes of mashing.
     
  4. Homebrew42

    Homebrew42 Initiate (0) Dec 20, 2006 New York

    Crush finer. For BIAB a "standard crush" is often not fine enough, and since you're not recirculating your wort in a mash tun, you don't have to worry about stuck run off. Try pulverizing it next time.
     
    jlordi12 likes this.
  5. Fattymcphatty

    Fattymcphatty Initiate (0) Jul 13, 2014 Michigan

    Ok! The biggest thing I'm hearing is stir more and obliterate the grains.

    Truth be told I was trying to get them superfine this last time around, but the mill could barely crush them at the standard setting...it took me about thirty minutes just to mess with that stupid thing to get them through once. I don't know if that wheat malt was just too hard or what, but that Barley Crusher pissed me off.
     
  6. CDennyRun

    CDennyRun Initiate (0) Mar 2, 2014 Washington

    Sounds like your LHBS's mill needs help, or replaced. That mill should be able to destroy that grain bill in less than a minute! This is the reason I bought mt cerealkiller mill. Cheap, reliable, and I don't have to worry about other jack-off's playing around with settings, or trying to grind something they shouldn't.

    PS: If you do change the settings on the mill, don't forget to put it back to where it was.
     
  7. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    My guess is that the mesh of the bag you are using is too fine.
     
  8. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    Half your recipe is wheat. Wheat kernels are smaller than barley kernels. If your grain mill is not crushing barley well, it is probably really not crushing the wheat at all. I usually get 70-75% efficiency, but batches with wheat have come in at 10-15% lower. You gotta beat your wheat.
     
    ChrisMyhre and Buck89 like this.
  9. MCBanjoMike

    MCBanjoMike Initiate (0) Aug 7, 2014 Canada (QC)

    I think this might be your problem. I've done BIAB twice now with roughly 75% efficiency each time, but the bag that I use is large enough that I can fold it over the top of my kettle and leave it open. This lets me stir the grain thoroughly at the start of the mash to get all the grain wet (and to keep the temperature even as the mash progresses). This was a cheapo 24"x24" bag that I got for about six bucks and it has been doing a great job so far.
     
    Buck89 likes this.
  10. Buck89

    Buck89 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,782) Feb 7, 2015 Tennessee
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    This is good to know. I use BIAB, and with my first wheat beer yesterday, my efficiency was 10% lower than expected. I've been scratching my head but this makes sense.

    Completely agree with this. I use the same size bag and secure around the outside of the pot with a bungee cord.
     
  11. Fattymcphatty

    Fattymcphatty Initiate (0) Jul 13, 2014 Michigan

    So just an update for everyone...if anyone cares.

    I know most of this discussion has revolved around BIAB, but I also mentioned that my cooler mash tun efficiency sucked as well. So, taking some advice, I changed a couple steps and did much better this time around.

    First, the mill seemed to crush better. I don't know if they swapped out mills or what (there used to be two, now there's three..and it looked a lot better).

    Second, I stirred the mash a couple times during the process.

    Third, I picked this up elsewhere, I normally batch sparge, but what I did was poke some holes in a piece of foil and laid it on top of the grain bed and did a fly sparge-ish technique. As the water level dropped below the foil, I'd pour in some 175 degree water on the foil.

    Last, I ran off slower than what I had in the past. Took a long time (an hour?!) but I got almost too much run off...is that common with fly sparging? Do I need to calculate water differently?

    Anyway, I was aiming for 5 gallons at 1.112. I ended up with 6 gallons (oops) at 1.090. So, if my calculations are right, I only missed my efficiency by 4 points, right?

    Thanks for all the suggestions...keep it coming if anyone's got more!
     
  12. shredder83

    shredder83 Initiate (0) Feb 21, 2013 Illinois

    With 50% of the grain bill wheat the mash probably doesn't have the power to convert the starches to sugars. I learned after my first saison which had about %30 wheat that my efficiency suffered because of the mash ph. Now i use a small amount of acidulated malt when i use that much wheat to balance the mash ph, i get normal efficiency in those grain bills now.
     
  13. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    Fact check:

    Wheat can have a grain size comparable to 2 row depending on the variety of wheat.
    Wheat can have a diastatic power comparable to 2 row depending on the variety of wheat.
     
  14. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Wheat malt has lots of diastatic power (i.e. enzymes).

    If mash pH gets high enough, it can certainly affect mash efficiency. But I wouldn't portray that as a lack of power. It's a matter of taking (more than) adequate enzymes and putting them in an inhospitable environment. As you figured out, the answer was to acidify the malt, not to add more diastatic power. I think you know this, but I wanted to clarify for the OP.
     
  15. shredder83

    shredder83 Initiate (0) Feb 21, 2013 Illinois

    I was thinking of the right idea of too high a mash ph, just the wrong wording. Thank you for clarifying VikeMan, I'm still working on the minutia of all this information.
     
  16. ChrisMyhre

    ChrisMyhre Initiate (0) Sep 15, 2013 Massachusetts

    Maybe it's a "hardness" factor? I definitely have seen lower efficiency with wheat in cases that I didn't specifically try to have it ground finer.
     
  17. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    I'll accept your first fact but it is contradictory to my personal experience. I don't know why the op had problems with this batch or why I routinely see lower efficiency with wheat. My explanation above is the best hypothesis I have for my own experience with small wheat kernels; like most hypotheses, it serves as a placeholder until observations lead to a better one. Waiting.
     
    ChrisMyhre likes this.
  18. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

  19. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

  20. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,635) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    OP, k'zoo tap water is moderately alkaline, so your pH might be high. One reason Bells makes tasty stouts and porters.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.