My first Dubbel recipe - please critique

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by od_sf, Jan 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Hello,

    I've been wanting to do a Dubbel for a while, finally going to do so next week. I'm at work so I can't put the ingredients into BeerSmith right now but this looks about right. Pieced together with ingredients I already have at home. Would appreciate any feedback. Thanks!


    2.5 gallon batch

    5.0 lbs Belgian pale malt
    0.25 lbs Belgian special B
    0.25 lbs Belgian carapils

    152 F sacch rest for 60 minutes
    170 F mashout for 10 minutes

    .05 oz German Tradition @ 60
    0.5 lbs soft Belgian candi sugar (brown) @ 15
    .05 oz German Tradition @ 10

    Wyeast 3522 (from 1.2 L starter) pitched at 66 F

    My two questions specifically: I've never used special B before. Is 0.25 lbs in a 2.5 gallon batch appropriate? Also, 3522 (which I have a smack pack of and need to use soon) is listed on the Wyeast site as appropriate for Dubbels. I'd agree with this as I do get a lot of esters and phenolics, and some alcohols with this strain, which would be in style. It would not be my first pick for the job (3787 would be) but I think it should do fine. Any input on this?

    Thanks!

    Olivier
     
  2. premierpro

    premierpro Savant (1,060) Mar 21, 2009 Michigan

    Looks like you could use more base malt.
     
  3. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    I'm shooting for an OG around 1.065. I can't access BeerSmith right now but would think that 5 lbs of pale malt + .5 lbs of candi sugar gets me pretty close to that (2.5 gallon batch). Will check those numbers when I put everything into BeerSmith and adjust accordingly.
     
  4. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Would anyone recommend adding some Munich in there (maybe 0.5 lbs)?
     
  5. JohnSnowNW

    JohnSnowNW Initiate (0) Feb 6, 2013 Minnesota

    The recipe I created, but haven't brewed yet, includes Munich @ 14%.

    A 1.2L starter seems kind of big for your recipe...but I haven't run the numbers.
     
  6. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Yes, I think some Munich will be nice.
    yeastcalc.com is down right now (the horror!) but my smack pack is from October, hence the slight size increase. Usually, with fresh smack packs I do 1 L starters, which is a very slight overpitch.
     
  7. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Oliver,

    My house Belgian Ale (that I brew twice a year) is a Dubbel. Below are some comments based upon my Dubbel.

    An OG of 1.065 is a good target. For my Dubbel I get an OG of around 1.066.

    The specialty grains that I use are Special B and Caravienne (0.5 lbs. of each). Your amounts of 0.25 sounds good but I would suggest Caravienne vs. Carapils (for a bit more malt character).

    I am assuming that you meant hop amounts of 0.5 oz. (vs. 0.05). I utilize German Hallertauer for bittering but either East Kent Golding or Styrian Goldings for late hop additions (flavor & aroma).

    My preferred yeast is 3787. I recognize why you will be using 3522. It has been a long time since I brewed with 3522 but I suspect that this yeast strain will make a tasty Dubbel. IMHO, the defining ingredient for making a Belgian Ale is yeast strain selection. I would highly encourage you to ‘re-make’ your Dubbel someday using 3787 instead and let the fermentation temperature rise into the low 70’s (e.g., 72-73°F) to encourage the yeast to make Belgiany flavors.

    Good luck with your Dubbel!

    Cheers!

    Jack
     
  8. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Some folks purposefully 'underpitch' when they brew beers like Dubbels to encourage ester formation. I would suggest that a slight overpitch is a bad idea for a Dubbel.

    Cheers!
     
  9. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Great advise and feedback, thank you Jack!

    Couple of questions: I don't have caravienne available, but I do have Vienna & Munich (as well as carapils). Would substituting some pale malt with Munich (or adding some Munich to the grain bill) provide increased malt character that would be appropriate in a Dubbel?

    Also, any issues with using Tradition for late addition in a Dubbel? Why do you prefer Goldings?

    Thanks again!

    Olivier
     
  10. PortLargo

    PortLargo Pooh-Bah (1,831) Oct 19, 2012 Florida
    Pooh-Bah

    At 0.25 lbs of Special B you are at ~4% which is probably okay. Munich might work, but I would also consider Aromatic and Caravienne malt. A lot of people will tell you that a complicated grain bill may give a "muddled" taste ... I am not one of them, properly balanced don't be afraid to add additional specialty grains.

    Like you said, 3522 would not be my first choice but I understand using what you have. I have had good luck fermenting 3522 in the low 70s. My current Tripel (3522) I dropped ferm temp to 66, beer is still conditioning but gravity-tastings are positive.

    It looks like yeastcalc didn't pay their domain fee . . . I find Brewerfriend and Beersmith a good substitute.
     
  11. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Thanks for the feedback. So it seems that the general consensus is that if I go to the LHBS and get some caravienne and 3787, I'll make a better Dubbel. Might just need to do that.
     
  12. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Oliver,

    Utilizing some Munich Malt is entirely appropriate. Permit me to suggest that you replace ½ lb. of Pale Malt with ½ lb. of Munich.

    “Also, any issues with using Tradition for late addition in a Dubbel? Why do you prefer Goldings?” There is absolutely no “issue” with using Tradition for a late addition. I prefer EKG/Styrian Goldings simply because I prefer their flavors/aroma: EKG has an earthy flavor/aroma that I like in a Dubbel and Styrian Goldings has a nice spicy flavor/aroma that I like in a Dubbel.

    If you have a ‘good’ fermentation with a characterful yeast strain (e.g., 3787 fermented warm and not overpitched) then hop variety is very much a secondary concern since the flavors/aromas of the Dubbel will be dominated by the ester and phenols produced by the yeast.

    For the Dubbels that I homebrew the prominent flavor/aroma is the Belgiany yeast produced flavors with the hop flavor/aroma and malt flavor/aroma both playing second string.

    Cheers!

    P.S. Another comment: the ‘preferred’ base malt for a Dubbel would be Pilsner malt (e.g., Belgian Pilsner Malt) but I think that Belgian Pale Malt will ‘work’ just fine.
     
  13. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Thanks again for all the advise. I have Belgian pilsner malt at home, as well as Styrian Goldings. Just called the LHMS and they have caravienne & Wyeast 3787. So, revised recipe based on all the excellent advise:

    2.5 gallon batch

    5.0 lbs Belgian pilsner malt (will adjust this as needed when entering in BeerSmith to get 1.065 OG target)
    0.25 lbs Belgian special B
    0.25 lbs Belgian caravienne

    152 F sacch rest for 60 minutes
    170 F mashout for 10 minutes

    0.5 oz German Tradition @ 60
    0.5 lbs soft Belgian candi sugar (brown) @ 15
    0.5 oz Styrian Goldings @ 10

    Wyeast 3787 (from 1L starter / cold crashed and decanted, pitching about 200ML slurry) pitched at 68 F, let free rise to around 73 F. (If the smack pack is VERY fresh, I might actually bypass the starter all together, which would be a slight (20 or so billion cells) underpitch).

    Any changes or additional advise?

    Thanks again so much!
     
    #13 od_sf, Jan 24, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2014
  14. BuckettOfBeer

    BuckettOfBeer Zealot (506) Mar 19, 2010 Minnesota

    Would it be advisable to make a starter for 5 gallons of 1.066 wort using 3787? Or just go with the smack pack? Let's assume it's fresh as can be.
     
  15. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Yes, you'd need a starter. One fresh smack pack would be a huge underpitch. 100 billion cells vs 228 billion cells needed, according to mr. malty.
     
  16. BuckettOfBeer

    BuckettOfBeer Zealot (506) Mar 19, 2010 Minnesota

    Ok thanks, I figured as much. I don't brew Belgian styles very often - at least not higher gravity ones so I wasn't exactly sure what's the right amount of "underpitching" to coax out the fermentation byproducts.
     
  17. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    For my 2.5 gallon batch I'm supposed to pitch 112 billion cells. I would think pitching something like 90 billion cells would still insure a full fermentation while making the yeast work a bit harder, hence generating byproducts.
     
    JackHorzempa and BuckettOfBeer like this.
  18. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I would suggest that you just pitch a smack-pack for a 2.5 gallon batch.

    Just a ‘reminder’ that you should conduct an extended boil (75-90 minutes) to drive off DMS (Pilsner malt has higher SMM amounts).

    Good luck with your Dubbel!

    Cheers!
     
  19. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Thanks for the reminder. Will do 75 minutes. I often do 60 minute boils with pilsner and haven't experienced any noticeable DMS off flavors in any of my beers, though.

    I appreciate all your valuable input Jack, have a great weekend!

    Olivier
     
  20. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    If 60 minute boils 'work' for you then please continue your practice. I have always boiled longer when using Pilsner malt due to 'conventional wisdom' but your personal experience trumps what people write about things.

    Cheers!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.