New Munich lager yeast strains available

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by BigAB, Apr 14, 2012.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    Ok, Ok - I'm trying not to let my excitement get the best of me, but does anyone have any information on either of these strains (besides what is posted below)?:

    Wyeast 2352 Munich Lager II
    From a famous brewery in Munich, this strain is a low diacetyl and low sulfur aroma producer. An excellent choice for malt driven lagers.
    Alc. Tolerance 10% ABV
    Flocculation Medium
    Attenuation 72-74%
    Temp. Range 52-62°F (11-16°C)

    White Labs WLP860 Munich Helles
    This yeast helps to produce a malty, but balanced traditional Munich-style lager.Clean and strong fermentor, it's great for a variety of lager styles ranging from Helles to Rauchbier.
    Optimal Temp: 48-52F
    Flocculation: Medium
    Attenuation: 68-72%
    Alcohol Tolerance: Medium

    Like I said, I'm trying not to get too far ahead of myself: I want to learn/brew more with just one lager yeast strain (the Ayinger strain, WLP833)...but these new developments might have me cheating on my conscience :confused:

    I'm doubting that anyone here has experience with either of these - searches on the interwebs show them to be very new creatures in homebrewing circles - but would anyone happen to have any further back story on one of these? The 'famous brewery in Munich', the interesting temp range listed for 2352 (I'll admit these can be a bit specious), or where White Labs possibly picked up their strain from? That 860 attenuation range looks odd/interesting too.

    I'm like a kid who just found out what he wanted for Christmas here!
     
  2. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    Bad news is that I see each of these yeasts is limited release :slight_frown: I may have to order both soon and freeze some of it until I decide what to brew.
     
  3. herrburgess

    herrburgess Grand Pooh-Bah (3,077) Nov 4, 2009 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah

    Dang. Why would they be limited release? Wonder which brewery/ies they are from?
     
  4. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Freeze? You don't mean just throw in the freezer, do you?
     
  5. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    Well - yes, I did. But I'm not sure if this would completely kill the yeast or not. I suppose it might be safer to simply refrigerate for up to several months, but...I dunno what the best yeast storage advice would be for the longer term. I could have sworn that I've heard of people freezing yeast before (or at least slurries) without bad effects.
     
  6. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I haven't tried it myself, but I think just freezing the packs/vials would kill the yeast. I do know that some people store frozen yeast long term using glycerin. Googling would probably provide lots of info on this.
     
  7. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    So it looks like glycerin would probably be the only safe option for freezing. No thanks. I suppose if I get some of each I will just have to refrigerate some of it for a month or so.

    Back to topic - does anyone out there have an idea on the story behind these yeasts? I'm helle curious.
     
  8. skivtjerry

    skivtjerry Pooh-Bah (1,865) Mar 10, 2006 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah


    Glycerin is not a big deal. It's in your beer. Most yeast produce a fair amount via side reactions during fermentation - enough in fact that you might very well get away with just throwing your yeast cake in the freezer. It might contain enough glycerin to protect the cell walls. It is good insurance to add 10% of drugstore glycerin just in case.
     
  9. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    Well, my initial reaction for not wanting to do it was actually due to the process behind all the different write-ups I reviewed. It seemed like a lot less a pain-in-the-ass to refrigerate for up to a few months and then make a stepped starter when I get ready to brew.
     
  10. skivtjerry

    skivtjerry Pooh-Bah (1,865) Mar 10, 2006 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah

    That is certainly a valid reason. I made very viable starters from a WY 2124 slurry that I kept in the fridge for 4+ years. All my new starters fermented the beer just fine. I made no lagers this winter so it's probably time to reboot, just in case.
     
  11. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    Does anybody have any more info on either of the yeasts from the OP? I doubt I'd be lucky enough to find anyone that's used either - but I'm still curious to find out more of a backstory. Currently, I've got the WLP860 on-hand and I'm thinking about making a helles with it soon. But I have a couple of questions due to the lower levels of expected attenuation:

    1) Normally one might see a helles in the 1.047-1.051 range for OG. FG is typically between 1.010-1.012 for all the great ones - obviously, I can't reliably expect to do that here with 68-72% ADF - but I'm not a stickler for staying within the style. Would it be a better idea to stick with something in the normal OG range, and finish out at ~1.013-1.015? Or just brew a slightly bigger beer and figure on something of an Export/Spezial strength/body, which I love as well?

    2) I know from limited experience that pitching a ton of healthy yeast and aerating the hell out of the wort can give results above and beyond the printed attenuation levels - does anyone else have any insight on trying to outperform expected results here?

    Many thanks in advance.
     
  12. BigAB

    BigAB Initiate (0) Aug 4, 2008 Iowa

    Nope...guess not :slight_frown:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.