Not another one of these threads

Discussion in 'Trade Talk' started by TomFoolery_x, Dec 16, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TomFoolery_x

    TomFoolery_x Initiate (0) Oct 4, 2012 Illinois
    Trader

    I know I know. Yet another thread asking if x beer can pull y beer.

    Looking for KBBS. Have up to 3 BCBS Rare to trade.

    What do you guys think? Should this get done? Should they have to add?

    Cheers!

    Edit: Not looking to trade these for anything else so any BM's will be futile. (Aka ignored)
     
    #1 TomFoolery_x, Dec 16, 2013
  2. Frankloydleft

    Frankloydleft Initiate (0) Apr 25, 2013 Colorado

    To answer your questions...

    I think you're giving up way too much. It doesn't matter how good KBBS is. You're "losing" on both $4$ and quantity of quality beer (I'm just trying to be rational, its obviously not about winning/losing). Plus Rare will never be made again, while TG has stated KBBS will be produced in the future in bigger batches.

    It "should" get done, but as I said before IMO it's not in your favor at all.

    Yes they should add. Preferably the whole TG lineup that is regularly available.
     
    #2 Frankloydleft, Dec 16, 2013
    polisanl and tommyz like this.
  3. huskermike12

    huskermike12 Initiate (0) Nov 14, 2011 Vermont

    :grimacing:
     
    #3 huskermike12, Dec 16, 2013
    Duff27 likes this.
  4. cardsfan

    cardsfan Pundit (850) Jan 8, 2013 North Carolina
    Trader

    I wouldn't do this at all either. Yes, I think two would probably get it let alone three but I think that is just way too much. Heck, I would trade one rare for a package of other BCBS variants (say a prop, cherry and bramble?) and that would probably score one.
     
    #4 cardsfan, Dec 16, 2013
  5. TomFoolery_x

    TomFoolery_x Initiate (0) Oct 4, 2012 Illinois
    Trader

    The way some of these ISO's have been you'd think rare and proprietors go 1:1. :grimacing:
     
    #5 TomFoolery_x, Dec 16, 2013
    cardsfan and imperialbeerdude like this.
  6. bramsdell

    bramsdell Initiate (0) May 27, 2011 North Carolina

    A fool and his Rare are soon parted...

    No. Stop. You're going so far over $4$ and oz for oz that in now way is this fair. Please, whatever you do, don't trade multiple Rares for a KBBS. No stout is better than multiple Rares.
     
    #6 bramsdell, Dec 17, 2013
    polisanl, TomFoolery_x and LambicKing like this.
  7. phishphorce

    phishphorce Savant (1,023) Aug 4, 2011 Pennsylvania
    Trader


    While I disagree with this statement. I would not trade mutiple Rare's for KBBS which will be made again.
     
    #7 phishphorce, Dec 17, 2013
  8. bramsdell

    bramsdell Initiate (0) May 27, 2011 North Carolina

    If you're going to use subordinate clauses. Make sure that you actually makes them clauses, not their own fragment of a sentence. Otherwise. Your response will contradict itself.
     
    #8 bramsdell, Dec 17, 2013
    Gutes_Bier and beerhan like this.
  9. bramsdell

    bramsdell Initiate (0) May 27, 2011 North Carolina

    And you sir sound like you don't know how to use commas.
     
    #9 bramsdell, Dec 17, 2013
    Gutes_Bier, vurt and maximum12 like this.
  10. BearsOnAcid

    BearsOnAcid Pooh-Bah (2,239) Mar 17, 2009 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    I think people were originally trading Rare 1:1 with KBBS when it came out. So anything over that is probably too much
     
    #10 BearsOnAcid, Dec 17, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.