Over attenuation: why and is it a problem?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Mag00n, Oct 29, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mag00n

    Mag00n Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2008 New York

    I brewed up a dank ipa about 9 days ago. Partial mash with very little dme, almost entirely ag. Anyways I missed my OG primarily because my lhbs shorted me about a 1.2 lbs of marris otter (wtf? probably last time going there) so in a pinch I bumped my sugar up just a tad to salvage some abv. My yeast is 1028 london and I was expecting an fg after being shorted grains of 1.015 without the sugar and 1.019 with the sugar.

    Well after 9 days I took a sample and it is down to 1.009. It tastes fine, bitter, hoppy, etc Im not complaining but Id like to understand why it got so low. I did mash low(150) for 45 mins, and fermented low(low 60's). Ive read that my thermometer could be off and it couldve been lower than 150?

    So Im wondering what couldve happened and also what are the characteristics/flavors of over attenuation? Is it just a dryer beer than expected?
     
  2. bigk84

    bigk84 Initiate (0) Jun 2, 2011 Michigan

    That's not really over attenuated, for an IPA that's fine, the sugar will be 100% fermentable making your FG lower, you're expected final gravity doesn't make sense, with the sugar you will always have a lower FG, not higher. BJCP claims 1.010 is recommended final gravity, but you really can't tell the difference between 1.009 and 1.010 anyway. You also mashed @150 which will make a dry beer anyway. You're fine, your sugar addition made your beer more drinkable for an IPA, well done.
     
    jsullivan02130 likes this.
  3. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    What was the OG of your IPA?

    Cheers!
     
  4. OddNotion

    OddNotion Pooh-Bah (1,915) Nov 1, 2009 New Jersey
    Pooh-Bah

    Sugar is 100% fermentable so your expected FG should have stayed around 1.015. Remember though, that is your expected range, there can be many factors that cause higher attenuation.

    What was the grain bill and how much DME?
     
  5. bigk84

    bigk84 Initiate (0) Jun 2, 2011 Michigan

    Also you can take variables into play like was your thermometer calibrated properly, you could have mashed lower, say 148 but had an actual reading of 150, or your hydrometer reading wasn't accurate without calculating for temperature of the finished beer...

    over attenuation occurs when your beer gets waaaaay to dry for style, like 1.002 (unless it's a saison or sour, then you're pretty much good).
     
  6. Mag00n

    Mag00n Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2008 New York


    Hmm that makes sense....Im using the hopville calculator and when you add sucrose to a recipe the fg goes UP, thats where my confusion is coming from.
     
  7. Mag00n

    Mag00n Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2008 New York

    og was ~1.068
     
  8. Mag00n

    Mag00n Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2008 New York

    These are estimates Im at work, but pretty close to actual
    4.5 lb maris otter
    .5 lb flaked oat
    .5 lb crystal 10
    .7lb sugar
    1lb extra light dme late boil

    3.9 gal boil 70 mins ~3gal yield
     
  9. mikehartigan

    mikehartigan Maven (1,421) Apr 9, 2007 Illinois

    Interesting. Since it's 100% fermentable, sugar can't cause the FG to go up, by definition. I've never used the hopville calculator, so I won't comment on its accuracy. But this is a biggie, IMO. Perhaps this error should be communicated to them.
     
  10. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    An OG = 1.068 and FG = 1.009 yields an Apparent Attenuation of 87% so you did indeed experience a lot of attenuation with this batch. I typically achieve 82-84% Apparent Attenuation for my IPAs (using US-05 yeast).

    In my opinion you achieved a fermentable wort via your mash of low 150s (maybe you mashed at 152F). The addition of sugar (which is 100% fermentable) created an overall very fermentable wort.

    You asked: "Is it just a dryer beer than expected?" In a nutshell that is the consequences of achieving high attenuation (a low final gravity). If you would prefer an IPA with less attenuation (higher final gravity) for a subsequent batch, then mashing at a higher temperature (e.g., 158F) and nixing the sugar addition will result in a less fermentable wort which will result in a higher final gravity.

    I personally like my IPAs which are attenuated in the lower 80's with a final gravity of around 1.010 - 1.012.

    Cheers!
     
  11. OddNotion

    OddNotion Pooh-Bah (1,915) Nov 1, 2009 New Jersey
    Pooh-Bah

    Vikeman has a big issue with this, IIRC this is the first thing he checks when checking out a recipe calculator (I follow his brewcypher spreadsheet thread). He has pointed this issue out about hopville before.
     
  12. MrOH

    MrOH Grand Pooh-Bah (3,995) Jul 5, 2010 Virginia
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    A lot of the online calculators assume 75% attenuation (or whatever you have the yeast's attenuation at) no matter what the sugar source, so that's why it went up. I'm confused as to how you used the hopville calculator, though, since it has been offline for more than 6 months.

    As others have stated, there are a lot of other factors; yeast pitching rate and health, oxygenation, and overall fermentability (determined by grist selection and mashing time and temp) of the wort all playing a factor. The big question is: are you happy with the beer as is?
     
    azorie likes this.
  13. Mag00n

    Mag00n Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2008 New York

    Ha see it's not just enough for it to be good. I believe to be very good at something you should understand how it works. So I'm just looking for a better understanding. And as for the hopville, ok brewtoad or whatever it is now, same thing basically, the hopville site redirects you there and the interface for recipes is the same..
     
  14. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Annoying, innit? Try this spreadsgeet and see if the answer changes...
    BrewCipher
     
  15. kjyost

    kjyost Initiate (0) May 4, 2008 Canada (MB)


    Yup. I haven't seen a commercial product that accurately predicts FG. I just change the attenuation of my yeast until it matches what I expect...

    For the record, adding sugar should actually depress your expected FG (but only very minutely) as alcohol is less dense than water
     
  16. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Indeed. My sheet also takes that into account. It can actually make a pretty significant difference, about a couple of FG points per pound in a 5 gallon batch.
     
  17. Longstaff

    Longstaff Initiate (0) May 23, 2002 Massachusetts

    Being able to predict FG/apparent attenuation is a result of experience. I don't know how homebrewers who brew a different style using different yeasts and ingredients all the time can expect to acheive the balance they are looking for....
     
  18. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Well, they could use a spreadsheet that predicts attenuation based on yeast strain, mash time, mash length, and grist.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.