Questions on a Belgian Tripel

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by HookerBrews, May 16, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HookerBrews

    HookerBrews Initiate (0) Sep 24, 2013 Oregon

    Hey Everyone,

    My Dad and I been brewing for about a year now and have averaged a batch a month since we started. We recently brewed up a Belgian Tripel mini-mash and we chose the recipe because it didn't call for letting it sit in tertiary fermentation for 3+ months. The fermentation schedule is actually quite short, especially for a beer that's probably going to hit around 9% by the time it's done. It calls for letting it sit in primary for 1 week at 60-65 degrees, racking into secondary for 1 week, and then bottling. I would provide more details, but I'm at work and don't have the recipe right in front of me.

    Does anyone think this is too aggressive for proper fermentation? Or does this schedule intend for bottle fermentation/conditioning? I know a lot of tripels are done this way, but I wanted to get people's opinions because I don't want to end up with bottle bombs or a cloyingly sweet finished product. Any input is much appreciated!
     
  2. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I personally would nix the secondary.

    How long you want the beer to 'sit' in the primary is your choice; just make sure that primary fermentation is complete.

    I have not seen any studies which quantifies (or qualifies) how an ale benefits from bulk conditioning vs. bottle conditioning. IMO, conditioning is conditioning. So, feel free to bottle your beer when primary fermentation is complete (or let t 'sit' for 1-2 'extra' weeks in the primary if you want).

    Since a Tripel is a high gravity beer (high alcohol) it will likely benefit from extended bottle conditioning time. I homebrew a Dubbel twice a year. I actually prefer drinking that beer younger vs. aged but the aged bottles taste good too.

    Cheers!
     
    nickfl likes this.
  3. nickfl

    nickfl Initiate (0) Mar 7, 2006 Florida

    Make sure you have sufficient yeast. This means make a starter. Also make sure you are using some simple sugars in the recipe. The most common mistake with this style is trying to make an all malt tripel. If you don't have some white sugar/clear candy sugar to lighten the body you will end up with an overly sweet, cloying mess of a beer.

    And as Jack said, you need to let it sit in primary until it is finished fermenting, the amount of time the recipe quotes for primary in irrelevant.
     
  4. Tebuken

    Tebuken Initiate (0) Jun 6, 2009 Argentina

    I think this kind of beer will last longer to finish fermentation,so I would let it sit in primary for 3 weeks , then take a gravity and compare it with what was you were expecting.If fermentation is done, it would be better to rack it to a secondary because is a must to let this high alcohol beer age for sometime(at least 3 months) to develop its best performance. Like a good wine, it must be aged, otherwise you are going to spend a lot of materials without a real reward.IMHO
     
  5. od_sf

    od_sf Initiate (0) Nov 2, 2010 California

    Like others have alreasy said, I would be leery of any recipe that tells you to move the beer off the yeast after 1 week. :rolling_eyes:
     
  6. PortLargo

    PortLargo Pooh-Bah (1,831) Oct 19, 2012 Florida
    Pooh-Bah

    I brew a Karmeliet clone (tripel, 8.4%) which is ready to drink in six weeks . . . so yes, it's possible.

    But I wouldn't take a kit manufacturer's word that it will really be ready. As suggested, consider a longer primary (2+ weeks), then let your hydrometer tell you if fermentation is complete. If you haven't been taking reading at the end of fermentation then now is the time to start. Look for a gravity close to your target and of course it must stabilize over several days. Do this accurately and no worries about bottle bombs.

    If the brew is finished I wouldn't hesitate to bottle at the 2-3 week mark and taste the first one in 6 weeks. It's possible to see improvement with extended bottle aging . . . this is where the brewer earns his money. Even with my "early-drinkers", I usually hoard a couple of bottles and sample in 6-12 months (here's where good record keeping pays off).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.