Rodenbach Vintages VS Regular

Discussion in 'Cellaring / Aging Beer' started by Twism86, Mar 1, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Twism86

    Twism86 Initiate (0) Nov 3, 2015 New Jersey

    Hi all, so the Rodenbach Red and Grand Cru are some of my favorite beers. Love the sour and tart flavors of them. I recently popped open a 2012 vintage and was less than impressed. Still had the tart aroma but I feel the aging mellowed out the flavors I enjoy. Anyone else feel the same?
     
  2. Leebo

    Leebo Initiate (0) Feb 7, 2013 Massachusetts

    I like them all. Viva la difference. Tried the caractere rouge? Worth every penny. Blackberries, cherries and cranberries? in the mix.
     
    NiceBeerCans likes this.
  3. Smakawhat

    Smakawhat Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,191) Mar 18, 2008 Maryland
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Easily one of my favorite breweries love everything they do so far.
     
  4. thepenguin

    thepenguin Savant (1,215) Aug 8, 2010 Massachusetts

    The Vintage series are single barrel, which any whiskey enthusiast can tell you is always a crapshoot.

    It could be that the aging was what let you down, but my bet is that it has more to do with the brewers not blending barrels for quality control, balance and consistency.
     
  5. Twism86

    Twism86 Initiate (0) Nov 3, 2015 New Jersey

    Thanks for the replies, looks like Rodenbach is re-releasing a beer called Alexander with cherries, sounds good! Will be looking for it.
     
  6. PaulQuinn

    PaulQuinn Initiate (0) May 27, 2011 Canada (BC)

    Re-releasing Alexander? What a great news :slight_smile: Now if only Palm wouldn't pasteurize it, my life would be complete.
     
    JohnfromPurdue likes this.
  7. RDMII

    RDMII Initiate (0) Apr 11, 2010 Georgia

    Close. Cranberries, cherries, and raspberries. Incredible beer.
     
  8. Leebo

    Leebo Initiate (0) Feb 7, 2013 Massachusetts

    My understanding is that they are individual foeders, not whiskey barrels. Large wooden fermenting/storage containers.
     
  9. thepenguin

    thepenguin Savant (1,215) Aug 8, 2010 Massachusetts

    I think you're right. So yeah, they're larger than most whiskey casks, but the point is that the beers aren't being homogenized with the Vintage series, hence the variability.
     
  10. Leebo

    Leebo Initiate (0) Feb 7, 2013 Massachusetts

    ^^^^ And also the uniqueness. Variety is nice. The foeders are quite large, maybe 500-750 gallons and are used for decades. Each has their own microflora.
     
  11. AndrewK

    AndrewK Savant (1,123) Oct 20, 2006 California

    FYI, the year on the Vintage is the year it went into the foeder, and ages two years before bottling, so the 2012 was bottled in 2014. Still an aged bottle at this point, but not as much as might be inferred at first glance.
     
  12. moose1980

    moose1980 Initiate (0) Jan 1, 2015 Germany

    Some of my favorites as well! From my experience though, the 2012 I had was actually much more intense than (fresh) Grand Cru. I would not necessarily say it was more enjoyable - much more vinegar astringency and wood tannins - but certainly much different than the Grand Cru and more complex. I have a few other Vintage years in the cellar, with a bottle of 2007 being the oldest. I am a little worried about how that one has held up, but we'll see.
    Prost!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.