Should we split up the Top 250 Rated Beers?

I just want a list of beers accessible in most areas, divvied up by type & in a normal person’s price range
Maybe there could be a separate category for some incredibly esoteric brews that are not readily available or financially accessible to most people for those World Class connoisseur types

 

Yes.
Mostly because the limited released beers tend to have a biased following and/or more extreme ratings (high and low) based on hype and other factors.

 

Not voting because I’m in the camp of keeping the present list as is but adding this other idea.

Im at 198/250. Thets a lot of work I’d prefer not to see go down the drain!

The bottom 15-20 rotate in and out a lot.

 

Keep the top 250 as it is - I've had 125 last time I checked.

Untapped already has a list of Top Rated Beers.

 

I voted no. I don't have any skin in this particular game; however, having finally attained 113 styles and 50+1 states after years of trying, I have to say I do appreciate the effort that tickers put into their quests. As others have stated, those moving targets are tough.

 

Though I have tasted 125 of the top 250, it has never been a serious focus of mine as I view the list as weighted to certain breweries and a limited number of styles. It is driven by hype and breweries that are within driving distance of where BAs are concentrated. There are many beers out there that are worthy of being top 250 but they are produced by breweries that are far from the crowds and they may only get a couple of reviews and a handful of ticks. I am not sure how you solve for that problem so I just do my thing and don't pay much attention to the top 250.

FWIW, I much prefer seeing the diversity of beer styles in the beers of fame list.

 

I personally visit BA the most for 1. Trades and 2. The Top 250 list. Almost two years ago I made it a goal to tick the BA top 100. I’m currently at 71/100 and would be very very disappointed to see this list altered. They are the best beers in the world they SHOULD be hard to get. The fact that I’ve been fortunate to try 71 of the top 100 in about two years shows you that while hard to get, with effort, a lot of them can be tried. Why does the top 250 have to be “easy” for ppl to get. If you want them and care, then join the trading forum fun. If you don’t want to put the effort in, then maybe ticking the top 250 isn’t for you. I’m not opposed to adding a “top 250 year round beer” tab…..BUT DO NOT ALTER THE TOP 250. @Todd you mention it’s one of the most visited things on the site so people must not care too much about it be “stagnant” if it changed frequently, no one would be able to chase it.

 

Perhaps this is heresy, perhaps it’s already been said: the current top 250 is significantly whack. I’ve had many across the list (and no, I don’t keep count), and the rating bias for a few not-to-be-named breweries and styles skews the list unrealistically.

Keep it, set it to the side, and let’s try for something both more accessible (but not overly so, I love my elephant hunts) AND more reasonable.

 

Solid idea. I don’t really care, so long as you don’t mess with the Beers of Fame list. That’s the REAL list worth ticking.

 

Beer Advocate does the list right. Breaking it out into affordability is subjective. Distribution can change (i.e. Founders in CA). A list with year-round beers would be nice, though.

See Untappd list for wrong way. Any beer with a year on the label should be on a separate list. I'm sure a 2010 Bourbon County was amazing, but it wouldn't be today and is a waste of space on a list. And I know this isn't an Untappd thread, but can I also say that Heineken is NOT a trending beer. A percentage differential should say what's trending not quantity consumed. Duh, 1,000's of people are drinking Coors Light right now...doesn't mean it's trending up or down.

 

I have a sneaking suspicion that at least some of the allure and mystique of the Top 250 is from the reputation of each beer and the effort required to get hold of it as opposed to the sensual qualities of the beer itself (a la the old Judgment of Paris in the wine realm). If that hypothesis is true, that implies it to be a list prone to reinforcing itself, because nobody who has invested the time, effort, and expense to get hold of any of those beers would rate them as on par with anything perceived as lesser or more common. For one example, I don't know that terribly many folks could reliably distinguish between St B Abt 12 and Westy 12 in a completely blind test, and one of those is on virtually every import shelf in the US while the other requires a trip to Belgium, an international order, or a trade.

The stagnancy of the list seems almost to be evidence for this hypothesis - keeping to that same example, no one at all has come up with a better quad in the time since Westy 12 hit the Top 250, regardless of experimentation? All others are vastly inferior, and the closest thing to the Platonic ideal of "quad" is and forevermore shall always be Westy 12?

This explains my preference for the Beers Of Fame list, and expressed opinion that expanding that sort of functionality to encompass newer beers would be preferable. That is but my opinion, based on how I approach beer acquisition and enjoyment. Others may find that the hunt truly does enhance their enjoyment and delight in a beer, and more power to them.

The suggestions to keep the overall Top 250, with either additional lists of more readily acquired beers or filters that can be applied to the Top 250 list itself, seem like the best of both the casual and thar-she-blows enthusiast approaches.

 

Very simple solution. Keep the current Top 250 and add a new query that excludes limited/seasonal beers and call it something else. Top 250 Attainable Beers, etc.

 

A little late to the thread here as I’d only been using the BA250 as a shopping guide wish list. With only about maybe 30 of them checked off the list I think it’s a good benchmark list - like the BA250 is the GOAT.

Keep it intact but add the top 100 for every year as rated by users, and then based off the BA250, it’d be easy to produce a top 100 seasonal list too. So:

1. Top 250 (or 100) GOAT
2. Top 250/100 year-round
3. Top 250/100 seasonal

Todd linked me here via the Discord so there’s my contribution

 

I would've argued to break it up, but people who have much more interest in it than I have convinced me to vote to leave it as is and perhaps add another means of doing the new list (others have posed good ideas).

I wonder if it would be possible to give some sort of indicator of the number of ratings/reviews for each beer in the last year and/or more recently (maybe last 3 months). IF possible, this could really be done for all lists. It could give people an idea of how available a beer may be and perhaps an indication of whether a beer is holding its position over time or resting on its past success.

 

There are currently options for country and state if you use the drop-down options, for example:
https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/top-rated/us/
https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/top-rated/us/tx/

 

I don’t really have a stake in this so take my opinion for what it’s worth. But one thing that’s great about BA is that you are sitting on a mountain of data. Not only do you have a massive database of beers, sortable in all kinds of ways, but you also have many years’ worth of user ratings and reviews. All of this is stating the obvious of course. But what’s interesting to me as a user is all the different ways you can slice and dice the data to reveal things about the current world of beer.

I think of the Beers of Fame as a list of the “classics” and the Top 250 as “tickers’ paradise.” Sounds like you are looking for something in between. Honestly I’d be OK with four or five different lists, as long as it’s clear what each represents. For the casual beer drinker it’s probably pretty frustrating to dive into the Top 250 only to learn that most of them are next to impossible to get. But as others have noted, from a marketing standpoint (both for BA and for breweries) it’s a valuable list to have.

So bottom line, I voted yes but I’d like to see lots of different ways all this data can be shuffled to get interesting results.

 

Please make a separate list of the top beers for the "common family man. Some of us do not make six figures, nor do we have the time to track down these expensive beers. Many of then are over-hyped, and many are high in alcohol. Sometimes, I think that is the only reason they are rated so highly. I have enjoyed some fantastic specialty beers from Genesee. A list that would include reasonably priced, not over $2 a bottle, and easily accessible beers across the nation would be fantastic and frequented by more people. Thanks for considering a different Top 250 list!

 

I don’t see any downside to splitting up the list into what’s accessible year round and what is limited/seasonal/regional. Up for whatever the group decides and frankly what is the downside to splitting apart the 250 anyway? Who would get pissed about that?

 

I wouldn’t recommend messing with the list but I like the idea of being able to filter looks at it. Top by style, top with no fewer than x# of reviews. The list motivated me to plan beer Safaris and get involved in trading, back in the day.