Here's what I mean. I recently read a review of Heady Topper, a beer I have never had, and found the scoring did not align with what was put in the explanation. This reviewer gave the beer a 2.5 across the board, and that's fine, but in the review they said the the beer looked really great and had a great nose. I get that the taste is the defining characteristic that sticks with us the longest, but the ratings are broken down into sections and should be treated as such. Now if you drink a beer and just shoot from the hip and say, its a 3 and mark it across the board with no explanation, you can do that even though I think this site is trying to get away from that, but don't drink a beer, say it's ass, give it an ass score, then talk about how great some of it attributes were in you write up. Anyone else ever see this?