Trade Dispute Resolved: @AW311

What you should have added to your lame feedback is that you strongly recommend that anybody who trades with @AW311 demands that he ships first and not to ship until his package gets received intact. He only completed this trade with you through the help of the community, that stood up for you........the same community that saw you, @Somel3uddy, feel no need to leave a feedback until @FATC1TY prompted you to do it and then only after @AW311 posted his good feedback for you. As far as I'm concerned, you let the same community, that helped you, down when you got what you wanted. Personally, I would not have any sympathy for you on any future Bad Trader threads and really would not want to trade with you either. You should be embarrassed in yourself, @Somel3uddy.

 

I'm just going to chime in here one last time....100% feedback is reserved for GREAT traders who perform their obligations ALL the time without any help or influence from others. To think that traders can pull this type of crap and have a *Bad Trader* thread created, but yet still have *perfect* feedback is mind boggling to say the least.

 

Hope this is just an early April Fool's joke. This in no way shape or form helps the community as a whole. Proper (negative) feedback would have given people a heads up that they better be prepared to give @AW311 a "second chance" in order to have him fulfill his end of a trade. Ridiculous

 

And yes, @AW311 deserved Bad feedback, not Okay from @Somel3uddy. Just so you know @Somel3uddy , most people just look at the [trading % | # of trades] under the user icon. By giving an Okay feedback, you kept @AW311 percentage at 100%. Which make you part of the problem for the next guy. You just raised his stats to 100% | 16. Good job.

 

Semi-serious question: do more bad trader threads end positively (I.e., bad trader comes through) or end up with the OP getting put on everyone's DNT list?

 

Done here. Thanks