Troubleshooting low Efficiency

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by janky, Aug 24, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. janky

    janky Initiate (0) Dec 9, 2013 Washington

    Hey guys...
    been having some problems with efficiency and I was hoping maybe some veteran homebrewers could shed some light.

    Basically, we're averaging 56-59% efficiency (based on Beersmith calculator).
    That seems absolutely horrible.

    Here's what I've ruled out:
    - It's not the milling. Our numbers are the same after milling at 3 separate sources.
    - Stirring during a batch sparge doesn't seem to do much to help. Numbers are the same either way.
    - Utilizing a false bottom with pickup hasn't made much impact over the old mesh screen tube we had.

    Here's what we've been doing:
    We use stainless steel Ballington kettles (not ideal, but they work)
    Heat sparge water in HLT while mashing
    After 60 or 90 min mash, draw off a few times and vorlauf until no grain particles are seen
    Pump 1st runnings into Boil Kettle and start the heating elements
    Pump sparge water over to MT (batch sparge) and let sit 20-30 mins.
    Stir occasionally, Vorlauf again, then pump 2nd runnings to BK.

    I've tried "mashing out" but without a recirculation type setup (HERMS or RIMS) it doesn't seem feasible. I've added a couple gallons of boiling water, and the highest I've gotten the mash temp was a pitiful 158 F.
    (This was following the 'step infusion calculators' available online)

    We've tried letting the batch sparge sit longer, up to 1 full hour, and it hasn't made a difference.

    We've tried building a PVC type sparge shower thingie, but it also hasn't made much difference.


    What can we do??
    This is really confusing us.
     
  2. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    When you say you have 56-59% efficiency, which efficiency are you talking about? Mash efficiency and total efficiency are different things.

    For example, I can have a 65% total efficiency in Beersmith and have an 82% mash efficiency. With the same beer, I could increase total efficiency by reducing total volume loss via transferring more trub to the fermenter, but the mash efficiency would be the same.

    One of the most reliable ways to improve mash efficiency is to crush the grain yourself. The crushed grain should look like coarsely ground coffee with very few partially crushed grains and some flour. Homebrew stores often provide a less than efficient crush.
     
    dmtaylor and MarkGP like this.
  3. MarkGP

    MarkGP Initiate (0) Jan 28, 2015 Rhode Island

    My first year of all grain brewing my efficiency was a lacking 60% at the most. I too tried to change things that I had control over. Different mash tuns, false bottoms vs. mesh tube, batch vs. fly sparging, and even messing with mash times. None really made much of a difference in the efficiency until I bought my own grain mill. I had tried mills from different homebrew stores and even tried a corona style mill from a friend, but nothing helped. The first brew I made with the new grain mill yielded a whopping 72%. Ah, those were the days. Jump into the future a few years and I am still getting a consistent 75-80%. I believe that the correct crush on a mill will benefit in your efficiency!
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  4. janky

    janky Initiate (0) Dec 9, 2013 Washington

    I'm guessing just mash efficiency then.
    Basically I'm gauging how much grain I have to put in to a recipe to hit a target SG, and when I use Beersmith, it is showing that my SG measurements are usually indicating a 56-59% efficiency (whichever that one is)

    Sorry if that doesn't make sense, I don't know exactly how to explain it.

    End goal: Get more gravity out of the grain bill, and spend less on larger batches

    Maybe.
    I've tried 2 different homebrew stores and a commercial brewer's mill.

    How can you tell if it's crushed enough?
    What do you set the mill to usually (in terms of roller gap, etc)?
     
  5. MarkGP

    MarkGP Initiate (0) Jan 28, 2015 Rhode Island

    Homebrew stores usually have their mills adjusting on the wide side. I would think a commercial brewer's mill would be set correctly but if your efficiency sucked then maybe it was something else. I have mine set to .030" which I believe is the thickness of a credit card.
     
  6. janky

    janky Initiate (0) Dec 9, 2013 Washington

    so is it pretty unanimous that it's more of a mill gap issue than the sparge/mash out?
    Am I at least doing that part correctly?
     
  7. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    [​IMG]

    This is an example of what I said in the previous post. The blue dot is total efficiency. The black dot is estimated mash efficiency. The red dots are actual mash efficiency and actual pre-boil gravity which is something you need to measure and log before you know your actual mash efficiency.
     
    janky likes this.
  8. janky

    janky Initiate (0) Dec 9, 2013 Washington

    ^Thanks.
    So Total Efficiency is factoring in equipment loss, trub, etc.
    Mash Efficiency is measuring how much sugars I'm getting out of the grains in conversion.
    both of these are theoretical targets based on the recipe/equipment profile.
    Measured (at the bottom right) is the actual data based on what I found the gravity to be pre-boil.

    Is that correct?
    If so my mash efficiency is hovering around the low 70's on most recipes. Is that acceptable? Is there a way to get that up to 80 or even 90%?
     
  9. HerbMeowing

    HerbMeowing Maven (1,295) Nov 10, 2010 Virginia
    Trader

    Credit cards are 0.039". Try reducing the mill's gap to 0.036".

    Large grain bills often lead to a lower brew house efficiency b/c the runnings collect the same volume as smaller grain bills such that a lot of sugar is left behind. SOLN: increase pre-boil volume and boil longer.
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  10. MarkGP

    MarkGP Initiate (0) Jan 28, 2015 Rhode Island

    Thought I heard that somewhere. I use a .030" feeler gauge to set mine.
     
  11. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    That's correct. The two values with the red dots aren't on the main page by default. I put them there. You can find them on the mash page.

    A mash efficiency in the low 70s isn't bad. You can make good tasting beer with a low mash efficiency. You just use more grain to get the gravity you want.

    Some things you can do to improve your mash efficiency. Make sure the mash pH is 5.2-5.6. Crush the grain finer by grinding it yourself. Double batch sparge.
     
  12. Tebuken

    Tebuken Initiate (0) Jun 6, 2009 Argentina


    What do you take as ´Batch size´ , the qty. of wort you get to be fermented or this qty. plus what is left behind in the boil kettle or the beer you get finally bottled ?
     
  13. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    Batch size is the volume of wort in the fermenter.
     
    Tebuken likes this.
  14. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    Take a picture of your next crush and post it. It should be fine granules, flour/powder is ok, no large pieces of malt, husks should be mostly whole, not ripped and shredded. I agree with everyone else, the crush is the most significant factor in efficiency.
     
  15. JimmieLovesBeer

    JimmieLovesBeer Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2015 Virginia

    While I can't account for other home brewer's experiences, I don't think milling is the issue. In John Palmer's book ,"How to Brew", he did a test to show that milling doesn't really make a difference in home brewing. For example, he did a 1 pass, 2 pass, coarse and fine grind crush and found that the yield difference was so small that over a long testing period the values could eventually be the same ( yields % in same order: 79.4,80.1,79.7,80.9). More fine millings also lead to a better chance of a stuck sparge. So to just play devil's advocate :wink:, I would place my bets that something else is going on. Cheers!
     
  16. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    I think Palmer is contradicting himself then. This is a quote from that book "A good crush is essential for getting the best mash efficiency and extraction." http://www.howtobrew.com/section3/chapter17-1.html

    Could you point me to his test? I'd like to see what mill gaps he compared.

    In my experience efficiency follows mill gap. If my mill gap slips (unknowingly) my efficiency suffers, when I tighten the gap back up, my efficiency comes back. It's very repeatable.
     
    Tebuken likes this.
  17. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

  18. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    If I use a coarse crush, my mash efficiency is always less than when I use a fine crush. I've seen 10% reductions in mash efficiency using a coarse crush.
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  19. GetMeAnIPA

    GetMeAnIPA Pooh-Bah (2,559) Mar 28, 2009 California
    Pooh-Bah

    If you don't have a mill or don't have the space/money to invest in one what do you recommend? My LHBS will mill it or let me mill the grains. Do ask to do a second pass? Do I go home do an extra crush with a rolling pin? Ask them what their mill is set at and see if I can adjust it (this one seems doubtful)?
     
  20. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    I would go by eye in that case. Take a good close look at a hand full of the crush to see how fine it is. I can't imagine the LHBS would mind if you ran it through a second time or if you asked for a finer setting.

    I've tried a rolling pin once in a pinch. I've never tried it again, it's a real PITA.
     
    GetMeAnIPA likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.