Very High Gravity Mash Temp

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by RallyMachine, Mar 10, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RallyMachine

    RallyMachine Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2015 Ohio
    Trader

    Gonna brew a really big RIS this weekend, target OG is 1.145.

    My question is, what temp should I mash at? I feel like a high temp like 155 or even a normal mash temp of 150-152 will leave far too many unfermentable sugars and I will end up with a cloying beer.

    I was thinking about mashing at 148 to counteract this. Am I correct in my assumption or will I end up with a super dry boozy stout?
     
  2. JrGtr

    JrGtr Pooh-Bah (1,775) Apr 13, 2006 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    What are you doing, a Dark Lord clone?
    I suppose the question is, what do you want your FG to be? What kind of mouthfeel are you looking for?
    I'd probably say that for a massive beer like that you probably do want a bit higher than normal mash - maybe in the 155 range. You're going to end up with a fairly high FG anyways, unless you go with a wine or spirits yeast.
     
  3. RallyMachine

    RallyMachine Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2015 Ohio
    Trader

    I had sr71 late last year and fell in love with it.... Looking for something big and chewy, but balanced and not super sweet. I'm planning on 92ibu so it should balance out alright. FG is estimated at 1.036 so I know it will finish high, but last thing I want is to mash too high and get a beer that finishes at 1.060... Also don't want anything that finishes at 1.010 and tastes like booze.
     
  4. CADETS3

    CADETS3 Initiate (0) Dec 3, 2014 Texas

    156 F and US-05
     
  5. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Pooh-Bah (1,765) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Without knowing your recipe and yeast selection it's just a shot in the dark.
     
    inchrisin likes this.
  6. GormBrewhouse

    GormBrewhouse Pooh-Bah (2,111) Jun 24, 2015 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah

    The recipe would be helpful, my shot in the dark would be the 152-155 range using a high gravity yeast and split the batch into 2 fermenters. 1.145 is gonna blow big.
     
    inchrisin likes this.
  7. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    I agree with the OP's initial thought, and would mash at 148 F for at least 90 minutes or maybe even longer (couple hours or overnight). That is one huge OG. People might love syrupy big beers but it doesn't need to be that way. Depends on what you prefer I suppose, just like anything else. A low slow mash will definitely improve attenuation if you want that. Yeast selection also matters most of all. Select your yeast carefully.
     
    CurtFromHershey likes this.
  8. chavinparty

    chavinparty Zealot (653) Jan 4, 2015 New Hampshire

    I mash at 149 forr my ris it's not super thick in t he end but there's a ton of malt complexity that covers any boozy. I got this from a Kate the great recipe I've been happy with
     
  9. inchrisin

    inchrisin Pooh-Bah (2,013) Sep 25, 2008 Indiana
    Pooh-Bah

    An overnight mash is likely to pull tannins out of dark grains. (Or, so I've heard. I've never run a mash that long). Add the dark grains right before you take your first runnings.

    Unless you are using a low attenuating yeast, I'd mash midway (154-155). Chewy and chocolaty wins the day--especially if you are oaking this.
     
    #9 inchrisin, Mar 10, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2016
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  10. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Good point, I think you're probably right. I've never done overnight either.

    As for chewiness...... at an OG that high, it's going to be chewy no matter what the hell you do. No need to make it "even worse" by mashing hot on top of it IMHO.
     
  11. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    If you want to produce the most fermentable wort, you may be interested to know that Kai Troester ran some trials and found the most fermentable single infusion mash worts were made at 151F. Greg Doss did similar trials, with similar results (though IIRC he found 152F to be the sweet spot). Higher and lower temps resulted in less fermentable worts.
     
    jsullivan02130 likes this.
  12. RallyMachine

    RallyMachine Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2015 Ohio
    Trader

    Thanks everyone for the advice. Started with a fresh smack pack of 1728 scotch ale stepped up in a 2L starter. Decanted, pitch a pack of us-05 and step again with 2L of 1.066 starter wort.

    As for grain bill it's 20lb of MO some victory and carabrown and a shit load of roasted malt that is in a seperate bag so I have flexibility. Total bill is 28ish lbs.

    I thought about an overnight mash but I'm worried lacto might get into it and sour it (I've been messing with sour stuff). I was thinking 2hrs at 150ish should maybe do the trick based on suggestions?
     
  13. GormBrewhouse

    GormBrewhouse Pooh-Bah (2,111) Jun 24, 2015 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah

    Good luck. I'll second the cautions on overnight mashing. 60 minutes or a bit longer should be fine.
     
  14. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    It won't sour quite that fast, takes at least 24-48 hours to notice any big difference. I've done a couple sour mashes in the past on purpose. Even after 3 days the tartness wasn't noticeable -- in future I would sour mash for more like 4 days if I try it again.

    But anyway.... yes, 2 hours at 150 F should give you a good result.
     
  15. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    Another option is to swap some malt for sugar. It will lower the FG and the beer would still be thick.

    S-05 and 1728 finish about the same for me, so supplementing with S-05 in this situation doesn't accomplish anything more than increasing the cell count and fusels while robbing the beer of malty character.
     
    chavinparty likes this.
  16. RallyMachine

    RallyMachine Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2015 Ohio
    Trader

    Yeah I'm adding 12oz of molasses to the boil as well to make it a little more fermentable. Since this beer is projected at 14.2%+ abv the us-05 was a safeguard to prevent the 1728 from crapping out due to abv limitations. I've heard a lot of high gravity brews mix strains to increase attenuation. Also fusels aren't a huge issue since this will sit in secondary for 8+ months
     
  17. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Whoa! How many gallons are you making? That's a lot of molasses if 5 gallons. Cut back to no more than 4 oz in 5 or it will taste very strongly of molasses. It can also give a major iron/blood flavor if you use too much.
     
    Dan_K likes this.
  18. RallyMachine

    RallyMachine Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2015 Ohio
    Trader

    Wow, did not know that! Thanks for the heads up!
     
  19. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    1728 has a higher abv tolerance than Chico. 1272 would have been a good single strain choice for a 14% beer.

    Long term aging isn't a magic fusel remover. Temperature control during fermentation can prevent fusels.

    Molasses is less fermentable than sugar. It has variable fermentability and can be comparable to malt in terms of fermentability. The amount you are planning to use after the dmtaylor correction isn't going to reduce your FG.

    What do you want your FG to be? If lower than 1.030, consider using some simple sugar instead of malt.
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  20. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    Wine yeasts are adapted to simple sugars found in fruit juices and mead musts and the like, so while they may be able deal with a high OG, they would not do well with a high OG wort. You would have a high FG with wine yeast, I believe. I know less about yeasts used for fermentation prior to spirit distillation. They definitely must ferment graib-derived worts, with maltose, maltotiose, and so on, but I believe a mash strategy for spirits would emphasize high fermentability.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.