Extra Pale Ale
Eel River Brewing Co.

- From:
- Eel River Brewing Co.
- California, United States
- Style:
- American Pale Ale
- ABV:
- 4.8%
- Score:
- 75
- Avg:
- 3.16 | pDev: 18.67%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 40
- Status:
- Inactive
- Rated:
- Dec 22, 2015
- Added:
- Nov 17, 2008
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
Certified Organic
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by jjanega08 from Minnesota
3.9/5 rDev +23.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
3.9/5 rDev +23.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
I am assuming this Cali Pale Ale is the same as the extra pale ale. No freshness dating on the bottle.
A= Pours a nice looking pale yellow color that is completely translucent with a finger of head on it. The head is active and holds nice retention and lacing on the glass.
S= The smell is faint of grassy hops and sweet grain. I dunno if it has wheat in it but it has a wheaty poopy smell to it.
T= The taste is a nice piney citrusy hop flavor with a nice sweet grainy malt flavor. The suspected wheat aroma doesn't come through in the nose and instead this is a nice hop forward easy drinker.
M= The mouth is perfect for having a few.
O= This is a solid brew. I don't understand why it is rated so low by BA standards. If I had this available I would drink it pretty often during the summer. If you can try it out do it. A light easy drinking APA.
Sep 07, 2013A= Pours a nice looking pale yellow color that is completely translucent with a finger of head on it. The head is active and holds nice retention and lacing on the glass.
S= The smell is faint of grassy hops and sweet grain. I dunno if it has wheat in it but it has a wheaty poopy smell to it.
T= The taste is a nice piney citrusy hop flavor with a nice sweet grainy malt flavor. The suspected wheat aroma doesn't come through in the nose and instead this is a nice hop forward easy drinker.
M= The mouth is perfect for having a few.
O= This is a solid brew. I don't understand why it is rated so low by BA standards. If I had this available I would drink it pretty often during the summer. If you can try it out do it. A light easy drinking APA.
Reviewed by cbarrett4 from Oregon
3.22/5 rDev +1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
3.22/5 rDev +1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
I usually like Eel River brews, but this Ale seemed more lager like than many I have drank. Poured with a rather flat and dull appearance and light head and lace. Still looks lively with carbonation and much prettier than those American lagers.
Again, smells more of lager like aromas than ale aromas. Rather light with some grassy notes and herbs. Light, crisp and mellow on the palate. Rather light and lacks the complexity I would like to make it more drinkable. Rather ordinary.
Feb 24, 2010Again, smells more of lager like aromas than ale aromas. Rather light with some grassy notes and herbs. Light, crisp and mellow on the palate. Rather light and lacks the complexity I would like to make it more drinkable. Rather ordinary.
Reviewed by erosier from Connecticut
3.36/5 rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
3.36/5 rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
L: Pours a nice golden orange color with a medium sized and medium bodied white colored head that laces the glass nicely on the way down.
S: Smells of sweet toasted malts, some floral and earthy hoppiness and that is about it.
T: Tastes of a sweet toasted malt base followed by a nice mellow floral/earthy/slightly citrus-y hop finish. I was expecting more hops, but this was probably more palatable for the malt that went in it.
M: Very crisp, fresh, refreshing, and the perfect amount of carbonation.
D: Very drinkable beer, more of a nice summer beer, but I liked it nonetheless.
Jan 21, 2010S: Smells of sweet toasted malts, some floral and earthy hoppiness and that is about it.
T: Tastes of a sweet toasted malt base followed by a nice mellow floral/earthy/slightly citrus-y hop finish. I was expecting more hops, but this was probably more palatable for the malt that went in it.
M: Very crisp, fresh, refreshing, and the perfect amount of carbonation.
D: Very drinkable beer, more of a nice summer beer, but I liked it nonetheless.
Reviewed by DavoleBomb from Pennsylvania
1.95/5 rDev -38.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2
1.95/5 rDev -38.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2
Poured into a pint glass. Bought this for a buck at local place. I was only going to have one beer tonight, but the last one sucked so bad that I needed to drink this as well.
2.0 A: Hazy brownish yellow color. Agressive pour resulted in half a finger of head that fell quickly, but surprisingly left a decent amount of lacing.
2.0 S: Slight (as in zero + the smallest discrete unit of measurement) floral hoppiness and nothing else.
1.5 T: Slight bitterness along with the meagerest of citrusy hops. Nothing else really going on other than musty vegetal-like flavor.
3.5 M: Not as horrible. Medium body, but it lays heavy on the tongue (like carbonated lead or something like that).
2.0 D: The worst part about tonight is that this wasn't even the worst beer I've had.
Nov 17, 20092.0 A: Hazy brownish yellow color. Agressive pour resulted in half a finger of head that fell quickly, but surprisingly left a decent amount of lacing.
2.0 S: Slight (as in zero + the smallest discrete unit of measurement) floral hoppiness and nothing else.
1.5 T: Slight bitterness along with the meagerest of citrusy hops. Nothing else really going on other than musty vegetal-like flavor.
3.5 M: Not as horrible. Medium body, but it lays heavy on the tongue (like carbonated lead or something like that).
2.0 D: The worst part about tonight is that this wasn't even the worst beer I've had.
Reviewed by Jmoore50 from Nevada
2.89/5 rDev -8.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
2.89/5 rDev -8.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
This looks like a glass of bud light. This is not what a good pale ale is supposed to look like. No head, no lacing. Poor attempt.
The smell is of citrus hops, and thats about it. This is not a very strong smell, overall a very faint smell of a hop product.
The taste is drinkable. This represents a very poorly made pale ale. There is no malt characteristic whatsoever. Actually, this tastes like a Bud Light with hop extract. Not special at all.
The mouthfeel is nicely carbonated and makes this thing drinkable. Cold and refreshing, that is about it.
The beer is drinkable, but no flavor or body makes this a memory that will soon fade out. This tastes like someone's first homebrew attempt. I hate to be a negative Nancy about this brew but this is not very good at all.
J
Nov 15, 2009The smell is of citrus hops, and thats about it. This is not a very strong smell, overall a very faint smell of a hop product.
The taste is drinkable. This represents a very poorly made pale ale. There is no malt characteristic whatsoever. Actually, this tastes like a Bud Light with hop extract. Not special at all.
The mouthfeel is nicely carbonated and makes this thing drinkable. Cold and refreshing, that is about it.
The beer is drinkable, but no flavor or body makes this a memory that will soon fade out. This tastes like someone's first homebrew attempt. I hate to be a negative Nancy about this brew but this is not very good at all.
J
Reviewed by xhcadamx from Maine
4.4/5 rDev +39.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5
4.4/5 rDev +39.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5
A - very light copper with a bubbly/foamy head that lingers and some nice lacing.
S - Cascade citrusy hops and a background of grain. Not overwhelming which you usually encounter.
T - Lighter hop presence than expected. But that's ok. Bigger isn't always better. Cascade / citrus type hops and a subtle amount of bready and biscuity grains.
M - tons of tiny bubbles so this has a nice bite.
D - I really like this beer and can appreciate a less EXTREME flavor.
May 27, 2009S - Cascade citrusy hops and a background of grain. Not overwhelming which you usually encounter.
T - Lighter hop presence than expected. But that's ok. Bigger isn't always better. Cascade / citrus type hops and a subtle amount of bready and biscuity grains.
M - tons of tiny bubbles so this has a nice bite.
D - I really like this beer and can appreciate a less EXTREME flavor.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!