Extra Pale Ale
Eel River Brewing Co.

Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Eel River Brewing Co.
 
California, United States
Style:
American Pale Ale
ABV:
4.8%
Score:
75
Avg:
3.16 | pDev: 18.67%
Ratings:
54 | reviews: 40
Status:
Inactive
Rated:
Dec 22, 2015
Added:
Nov 17, 2008
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  0
Certified Organic
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
 
Rated: 3 by jrob21 from North Carolina

Dec 22, 2015
 
Rated: 3 by Elicoleman from Colorado

Aug 29, 2014
 
Rated: 3 by zestar from California

Aug 08, 2014
 
Rated: 3.75 by Endocador from California

Jul 24, 2014
 
Rated: 3.75 by LXIXME from New Mexico

Apr 02, 2014
 
Rated: 3 by ygtbsm94 from Utah

Oct 21, 2013
 
Rated: 3.5 by flexabull from California

Sep 26, 2013
 
Rated: 3 by ejimhof from Pennsylvania

Sep 19, 2013
Photo of jjanega08
Reviewed by jjanega08 from Minnesota

3.9/5  rDev +23.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
I am assuming this Cali Pale Ale is the same as the extra pale ale. No freshness dating on the bottle.

A= Pours a nice looking pale yellow color that is completely translucent with a finger of head on it. The head is active and holds nice retention and lacing on the glass.

S= The smell is faint of grassy hops and sweet grain. I dunno if it has wheat in it but it has a wheaty poopy smell to it.

T= The taste is a nice piney citrusy hop flavor with a nice sweet grainy malt flavor. The suspected wheat aroma doesn't come through in the nose and instead this is a nice hop forward easy drinker.

M= The mouth is perfect for having a few.

O= This is a solid brew. I don't understand why it is rated so low by BA standards. If I had this available I would drink it pretty often during the summer. If you can try it out do it. A light easy drinking APA.
Sep 07, 2013
 
Rated: 3 by JTomczak from Connecticut

Aug 06, 2013
 
Rated: 3.5 by GeorgeH from California

Jul 14, 2013
 
Rated: 3 by williamjbauer from Colorado

May 22, 2013
 
Rated: 3.5 by outoffocus from Pennsylvania

Jan 13, 2013
 
Rated: 3 by t0rin0 from California

Nov 19, 2012
 
Rated: 4 by Nage37 from California

Jul 04, 2012
Photo of cbarrett4
Reviewed by cbarrett4 from Oregon

3.22/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
I usually like Eel River brews, but this Ale seemed more lager like than many I have drank. Poured with a rather flat and dull appearance and light head and lace. Still looks lively with carbonation and much prettier than those American lagers.

Again, smells more of lager like aromas than ale aromas. Rather light with some grassy notes and herbs. Light, crisp and mellow on the palate. Rather light and lacks the complexity I would like to make it more drinkable. Rather ordinary.
Feb 24, 2010
Photo of erosier
Reviewed by erosier from Connecticut

3.36/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
L: Pours a nice golden orange color with a medium sized and medium bodied white colored head that laces the glass nicely on the way down.
S: Smells of sweet toasted malts, some floral and earthy hoppiness and that is about it.
T: Tastes of a sweet toasted malt base followed by a nice mellow floral/earthy/slightly citrus-y hop finish. I was expecting more hops, but this was probably more palatable for the malt that went in it.
M: Very crisp, fresh, refreshing, and the perfect amount of carbonation.
D: Very drinkable beer, more of a nice summer beer, but I liked it nonetheless.
Jan 21, 2010
Photo of DavoleBomb
Reviewed by DavoleBomb from Pennsylvania

1.95/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2
Poured into a pint glass. Bought this for a buck at local place. I was only going to have one beer tonight, but the last one sucked so bad that I needed to drink this as well.

2.0 A: Hazy brownish yellow color. Agressive pour resulted in half a finger of head that fell quickly, but surprisingly left a decent amount of lacing.

2.0 S: Slight (as in zero + the smallest discrete unit of measurement) floral hoppiness and nothing else.

1.5 T: Slight bitterness along with the meagerest of citrusy hops. Nothing else really going on other than musty vegetal-like flavor.

3.5 M: Not as horrible. Medium body, but it lays heavy on the tongue (like carbonated lead or something like that).

2.0 D: The worst part about tonight is that this wasn't even the worst beer I've had.
Nov 17, 2009
Photo of Jmoore50
Reviewed by Jmoore50 from Nevada

2.89/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
This looks like a glass of bud light. This is not what a good pale ale is supposed to look like. No head, no lacing. Poor attempt.

The smell is of citrus hops, and thats about it. This is not a very strong smell, overall a very faint smell of a hop product.

The taste is drinkable. This represents a very poorly made pale ale. There is no malt characteristic whatsoever. Actually, this tastes like a Bud Light with hop extract. Not special at all.

The mouthfeel is nicely carbonated and makes this thing drinkable. Cold and refreshing, that is about it.

The beer is drinkable, but no flavor or body makes this a memory that will soon fade out. This tastes like someone's first homebrew attempt. I hate to be a negative Nancy about this brew but this is not very good at all.

J
Nov 15, 2009
Photo of xhcadamx
Reviewed by xhcadamx from Maine

4.4/5  rDev +39.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5
A - very light copper with a bubbly/foamy head that lingers and some nice lacing.

S - Cascade citrusy hops and a background of grain. Not overwhelming which you usually encounter.

T - Lighter hop presence than expected. But that's ok. Bigger isn't always better. Cascade / citrus type hops and a subtle amount of bready and biscuity grains.

M - tons of tiny bubbles so this has a nice bite.

D - I really like this beer and can appreciate a less EXTREME flavor.
May 27, 2009