R.J. King Wingwalker Lager
World Brews

R.J. King Wingwalker LagerR.J. King Wingwalker Lager
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
World Brews
 
California, United States
Style:
American Lager
ABV:
4.5%
Score:
71
Avg:
2.88 | pDev: 14.58%
Ratings:
42 | reviews: 31
Status:
Inactive
Rated:
Jan 04, 2015
Added:
Jul 11, 2006
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  1
No description / notes.
View: More Beers
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Ratings by NickyPogs:
Photo of NickyPogs
Rated by NickyPogs from Illinois

3.25/5  rDev +12.8%

Dec 27, 2012
More User Ratings:
 
Rated: 2.93 by rabbitguy from Illinois

Jan 04, 2015
 
Rated: 2.5 by wrightst from Maryland

Jun 08, 2014
 
Rated: 3 by t0rin0 from California

Nov 19, 2012
 
 
Rated: 3 by DerwinWentworth from Utah

Jun 18, 2012
Photo of smcolw
Reviewed by smcolw from Massachusetts

3.25/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Starts with a decent head (more than a finger thick), but it dissipates quickly to a single layer of bubbles. A couple of spots are left on the glass side. The beer is clear with a light gold color.

Slightly sour smell of predominant malt. I give them some credit for the mild pepper hop spice in the background.

Creamy and grainy malt presence on the tongue. Less thin than most macros, but more so than micro's lagers. Very little hop flavor, but still very smooth drink. Definitely fits into the lawnmower category, but it is a decent one.
May 20, 2012
 
Rated: 2.75 by avisong from Virginia

May 18, 2012
 
Rated: 2 by scootercrabb from Illinois

Mar 19, 2012
Photo of EricCioe
Reviewed by EricCioe from Montana

3/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
From the $0.89 bin at Orange Street Food Farm. Always worth it as a single.

This pours a very pale yellow with a decent white head. On the nose there is wet grain with a surprising presence of real, actual hops. They don't dominate but they definitely assert themselves florally. In the mouth the hops provide a fruity note mixing with some basic dough. The finish is pretty short, the body is light.

Overall, there are many, many worse pale lagers than this. The actual inclusion of hops is a well-appreciate change from the norm.
Mar 19, 2012
 
Rated: 3 by Stoffel from Texas

Jan 02, 2012
 
Rated: 3 by muddyh2oblues from Illinois

Dec 31, 2011
Photo of BeerKangaroo
Reviewed by BeerKangaroo from Alaska

2.96/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Into a pint glass (also sampled in a pilsener, no change):

A: clear golden yellow body, bubbly white head that slowly falls

S: clean fresh malts, but that's it

T: just malts, no balance

M: light, sessionable, soapy aftertaste, sweet finish saves it a bit

O: decent for the style, decent for me, had it with pizza and it was acceptable then
Dec 10, 2011
 
Rated: 2.5 by barnzy78 from Illinois

Nov 29, 2011
Photo of wmtxbb
Reviewed by wmtxbb from Illinois

3.44/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Bottle poured into pint glass

Appearance: The non-existant head makes this beer look like soda; sort of looks like sprite.

Smell: soft malts and citrus.

Taste: crisp malts, citrus, toffee, butter. Has a very light body, buttery mouthfeel.

Very drinkable, simple taste; this would be a great beer to have with food, or as a session beer.
Feb 28, 2011
Photo of erolevar
Reviewed by erolevar from Vermont

1.53/5  rDev -46.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1
This beer does not taste good. It smells and tastes like a cheap beer. It is not worth the money that a premium beer can ask. I can't think of anything good to say about this beer other than I'm hoping it will be gone soon. I've tried pawning the beer off on people and they didn't want to drink it either.
Jan 13, 2011
Photo of Tundruth
Reviewed by Tundruth from New Hampshire

3.17/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Saw this at the supermarket in 6 packs and picked it up just to try something new and different.

Seems well done for the style and overall I really liked it. Nothing spectacular, but definitely beats any macro "lager" that I've ever had the displeasure of drinking in the past.

pours a clear golden yellow topped with a tall bubbly head that raises and then slowly falls leaving behind a nice roam rim and lacing. Smells clean, fresh, and like a lager should. Taste is on key for a lager, but doesn't have anything to it to really set it off. Mouth feel was pretty good, very drinkable but a little too sweet. The drinkablility on this one is average, Id say. Its good enough that it's sessionable, however, anyone who appreciates their drinking experience would likely get sick of this after a few and want to switch to something with more of a flavor profile to it.
Oct 03, 2010
Photo of jwinship83
Reviewed by jwinship83 from Illinois

2.2/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
12oz bottle with no visible freshness information drank from an american pint glass.

A- this one pours out fizzy and golden. a very small white head forms and vanishes in a matter of seconds. little to no lacing is left behind.

S- the smell is faint. grainy cereal malts. overly sweet smelling.

T- the taste mimics the scent. cereal like grainy malts. sweeter than i was expecting. meh.

M- light bodied and as carbonated as i was anticipating.

D- not a style i typically go for or one that i really get into, but this seems on the lower end of the spectrum. i suppose it would make for a decent lawn mower beer.
May 05, 2010
Photo of Jason
Reviewed by Jason from Massachusetts

3.07/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3
12oz brown bottle with no freshness date.

Head fades quickly to pretty much nothing other than a few crackling bubbles that have freshly risen to the top. Pale yellow golden color, decent clarity. Weak malt sweetness, faint fruit and taffy as well in the nose. Good crispness, wet moderate sized body. Malt is plain, a little husky with some sweetness. Hop bitterness is there and balances, flavor comes in with an herbal note. Finishes semi-sweet.

Run of the mill lager, pretty plain even though it has more flavor than most of the mass produced industrial lagers. If it is priced more than $5.99 a six-pack then it is not worth it IMO.
Feb 04, 2010
Photo of Minkybut
Reviewed by Minkybut from Virginia

3/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
I poured this average Joe beer into my tired tumbler at 45 degrees. The beer was a golden color with a white head. The head went away very fast. The smell was average beer smelling bready maybe yeasty with a sweet aftertaste. It was a pretty normal tasting beer that was not terrible but did not open your eyes and say yum either. i will not buy again.
Jan 10, 2010