The Pure And Simple IPA Is Rarely Pure And Never Simple
Evil Twin Brewing

The Pure And Simple IPA Is Rarely Pure And Never SimpleThe Pure And Simple IPA Is Rarely Pure And Never Simple
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Evil Twin Brewing
 
New York, United States
Style:
Hazy Pale Ale
ABV:
4.5%
Score:
85
Avg:
3.74 | pDev: 9.89%
Ratings:
31 | reviews: 10
Status:
Inactive
Rated:
Aug 17, 2020
Added:
Aug 21, 2018
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  1
No description / notes.
View: More Beers
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
 
Rated: 3.69 by dt_gbpackersfan from Missouri

Aug 17, 2020
Photo of ChrisMon02
Reviewed by ChrisMon02 from Ohio

3.79/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75
Batch 101-whatever that means.

Pours cloudy orange color with a huge white foamy head that doesn’t quit.

Smells of apricot and peach skins. Light funkiness resembling a Saison.

Taste follows the nose. This drinks like a Brett Saison and very little like an IPA.

Mouthfeel is light-medium with Belgium like carbonation.

Not bad but weird. Not what I expected in a “session” IPA.
Aug 03, 2020
 
Rated: 4.2 by chiefz1 from New York

Jul 18, 2020
 
Rated: 3.99 by Gkruszewski from New York

Feb 12, 2020
 
Rated: 2.75 by Mattias from Sweden

Feb 08, 2020
Photo of AdmiralOzone
Reviewed by AdmiralOzone from Minnesota

2.69/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5
Pours an apricot gold with a massive white head that refuses to fade. Great lacing. Aroma is muted citrus and tropical fruits. Flavor is sour and unpleasant. Feel is light and well carbonated. Overall disappointing. Was hoping for a nice session ale. Couldn't finish it due to the sourness.
Jan 02, 2020
 
Rated: 3.83 by Jonathan-Morgan from Florida

Dec 31, 2019
 
Rated: 3.84 by desint from Belgium

Sep 28, 2019
 
Rated: 3.93 by blissfulNemo from Michigan

Sep 01, 2019
 
Rated: 3.88 by BarryMFBurton from Indiana

Aug 23, 2019
 
Rated: 3.88 by ummswimmin from New Jersey

Aug 05, 2019
Photo of tone77
Reviewed by tone77 from Pennsylvania

3.53/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
A thanks to the reigning champion of canned beer, woodychandler, for this beer. Poured from a 16 oz. can. Has a dark golden color ith a 1 inch head. Smell is of peaches, some oranges. Taste is oranges, a bit of grapefruit, mild bitterness. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is a decent beer, although I don't think it should be classified as a New England IPA.
Jul 08, 2019
 
Rated: 3.9 by craigbelly from Iowa

Apr 08, 2019
 
Rated: 3.92 by WillieThreebiers from Connecticut

Mar 26, 2019
 
Rated: 3.5 by Dutchcraftbeergeek from Netherlands

Mar 21, 2019
 
Rated: 3.99 by 6thstreetbrewpub from District of Columbia

Mar 12, 2019
Photo of russpowell
Reviewed by russpowell from Arkansas

3.2/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3
Pours a hazed gold with 3 fingers of rocky ivory colored head ( vigirous pour ) . Good head retention & lacing

S: A little orange peel, a little grassyness once warm

T: Follows the nose, a touch of grainyness as well up front. A little grassy hops and dryness mixes in as this warms, the citrus takes a back seat, but still on the edges. Finishes dry, grassy, with a little lime

MF: Light bodied, restrained carbonation, a tad watery

I expected more out of this, just meh to dissapointing for this style
Feb 19, 2019
 
Rated: 3.52 by swierczt from Connecticut

Feb 15, 2019
Photo of StonedTrippin
Reviewed by StonedTrippin from Colorado

3.99/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
an assertively dry hopped session type ipa here, real low on the bitterness and big on the new school fruitiness. yet another long winded name on a trendy ipa type from evil twin, i wish they were cheaper but i have liked the beers just about every time. this one has a matte sort of washed out shade to it but a very active white head and a ton of carbonation. there is some haze, but its lighter looking than a lot of these have been so far. lots to like in terms of aroma and flavor, even though it all seems just a little tired to me. big melon notes from the hops, canned fruit cocktail as well, pineapple rings, orange tic tacs, and even a light salinity thats hard to figure out. the grain base is light but has a dry wheaty cereal complexion that supports the hops well, it feels light and airy, but not watery, its fluffy and with some protein, a nice texture for this for sure. heavy melon in the flavor, especially in the finish, and some generic citrus along with canned pineapple for me, better and better as it warms, like the temperature makes it fresher and more vibrant on the palate. carbonation is exceptionally high, but it adds a refreshing element to the beer. it could finish a touch drier, but i like the length of this as a session beer, no as fast and minimal as many of them. cool beer, i guess if they keep making them ill keep trying them...
Feb 11, 2019
Photo of deleted_user_1111368
Reviewed by deleted_user_1111368 from Delaware

3.79/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
No idea when this was canned.
L: Pours Lightly clouded, light orange. Tiny head, with little lacing.
S: Light on the aroma side.. mellow tropical and citrus. Pine hints late.
T: Muted flavors of pine, orange, maybe a tinge of melon. Hard to recognize the flavors.
F: Light-medium. Overly carbonated. Mild bitterness, but lasting.
O: Not a bad beer, but there wasn't a lot of flavors going on. With batch #001 on the bottom, I'm not sure about the age. Even for a session brew, it's just not what I have come to expect from ET.
Feb 02, 2019