Rhinoel
Lost Rhino Brewing Company

Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Lost Rhino Brewing Company
 
Virginia, United States
Style:
Belgian Dubbel
ABV:
7.5%
Score:
81
Avg:
3.48 | pDev: 9.2%
Ratings:
28 | reviews: 10
Status:
Inactive
Rated:
Apr 10, 2016
Added:
Nov 29, 2011
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  2
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Photo of HattedClassic
Reviewed by HattedClassic from Virginia

3.27/5  rDev -6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
*From Notes*
The beer certainly has an interesting look that resembles a red grapefruit with a red spot in it. The beer is also cloudy. It actually resembles more of a cocktail than anything else.

The smell and taste are a bit disappointing but just as interesting. The beer has some strong barrel notes and strong cherry notes. The barrel notes are both woody with a bit of vanilla to it and those tend dominate the other notes. The grapefruit hop notes do come out but easily gets lost in the cherry. While there is a tart note to the beer, it easily gets lost in the wood.

The feel is smooth with some light carbonation to it. It feels kind of like juice.

Overall, an interesting beer but I wouldn't take time out of my day to look for it.
Apr 10, 2016
 
Rated: 3.75 by jvgoor3786 from Arkansas

Dec 03, 2015
 
Rated: 3.49 by Boone757 from Virginia

Jul 16, 2015
Photo of Jeffreysan
Reviewed by Jeffreysan from Virginia

3.12/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3
22 oz bottle, poured into a goblet

Appearance: Pours a beautiful, completely opaque, deep, dark mahogany color, speckled with reddish and orange highlights, and an extremely thin lacing of white-colored head that quickly and completely dissolved away into no head what-so-ever.

Aroma: Interesting, yet odd aromas. Very fruity, yet very vinegary at the same time. Has it soured? Skunked? Did the brewer intend the vinegary aromas? I get a lot of bready, toasted malt as well as dried stone fruit, such as dates, raisins, prunes, and sour cherries, as well as some candied sugar, and funky, dank, Belgian yeast.

Taste: Very interesting flavors too. Nice flavors of toasted malt, brown sugar-like sweetness, dried stone fruit, such as dates, raisins and prunes, candied sugar, funky, dank, Belgian yeast, a touch of sour cherry, and a touch of odd, vinegary-like sourness.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied and extremely smooth as there is very little carbonation. With an ABV of 7.5%, there is no alcohol on the palate.

Overall: I’m a little conflicted on this beer. It’s certainly odd and a little vinegary and sour, but I don’t necessarily dislike it. However, I don’t necessarily like it either. It’s an odd beer.
Jun 20, 2015
 
Rated: 3.43 by Keene from Washington

Mar 08, 2015
 
Rated: 3.54 by Drknight from Virginia

Feb 22, 2015
Photo of delta490
Reviewed by delta490 from Virginia

3.5/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Pours a cloudy ruddy brown with a very short-lived fizzy white head. No retention at all. Visibly carbonated. The aroma is a little musty, but as it warms it gains some caramel sweetness and some dark fruit qualities. The taste is pretty close to the aroma, good but also a little underwhelming. The body is also a little thin a over-carbonated. It's good but nothing spectacular.
Feb 07, 2015
 
Rated: 3.5 by Griffin2 from Virginia

Feb 01, 2015
Photo of Redrock
Rated by Redrock from Virginia

3.8/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Sweet, dark fruits, Belgian yeast, spice, banana bread.
Jan 08, 2015
 
Rated: 4 by redfox405 from Virginia

Dec 24, 2014
 
Rated: 3.25 by CaptBreadbeard from Virginia

Dec 13, 2014
 
Rated: 3 by VirginiaBeerMan from Virginia

Dec 12, 2014
 
Rated: 2.88 by Ngntjp from Virginia

Dec 10, 2014
 
Rated: 3.25 by Dave_Treat from Virginia

Nov 20, 2014
 
Rated: 3.5 by cliff1066 from Virginia

Jan 07, 2013
 
Rated: 3.5 by djre4orm from Virginia

Oct 04, 2012
 
Rated: 3.5 by GaryMarkle84 from Virginia

Aug 12, 2012
Photo of Daniellobo
Reviewed by Daniellobo from Spain

3.88/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
A rather nice and welcome local take on the Dubbel style.

Presentation: 75 cl brown corked and capped bottle. Blue and black illustration over a vanilla background of the Rhino with a sledge on the back over a snowy forest-mountain background (Loving the barcode shaped like Rhino). Small side paragraph noting style, intent, and main flavor. Shows 7.5% Alc. by Vol. Served in a tulip glass.

A - Lightly hazy amber/brown pour, with a nice frothy head, moderate retention, fair surface memory and some touches of lacing.

S - Pleasing if somewhat soft and a bit subdued nose with yeast, malt, caramel and fruity notes...

T - …holding up the flavor with dexterity. Malty, caramel, soft dark fruit, a hint of spice that may be goes beyond the yeast with some nutmeg or all spice? Subtle and well in any case.

M - Medium body with medium carbonation providing a fair smooth tingly finish over a nice lightly creamy flow.

O - Very pleasing flow, quite a nice take on the Dubbel. Glad to give props to Lost Rhino on this one.

Notes: The surprise lies in that this might be quite a capable, and beyond, local take on a Dubbel. Obvious challenge is that a Dubbel is not too popular a style, more so in terms of sales. However I find hard to fathom that beer aficionados may not be able recognize that this is quite a notable local brew for the style. I had it first on cask on a Xmas tap menu, and for the first time on me Lost Rhino made a dent. Shortly after I saw these discounted bottles. And I don´t know about the original release, but quality-price ration on this offer was stellar. I sure wish I could have picked up more. LR, keep on brewing?
Jan 31, 2012
Photo of Thorpe429
Reviewed by Thorpe429 from Illinois

2.86/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
On tap at Evening Star Cafe. Served in a tulip.

Pours a nice reddish-amber color with a hefty off-white head and a good bit of lacing. Great retention. The nose carries some faint spice and loads of dark fruit. Some cherry there as well.

The flavor falls downhill from the nose, as there's quite a bit of grain tannin coming through and drying the beer and giving it a somewhat-unpleasant bitterness. Fruits are there covering up a lot, and the other malt flavors are nice, but it's a bit too much to look past. The same goes for the feel. No real alcohol presence.

The nose was promising in this one, but the grain issues really hurt the finished product.
Jan 28, 2012
 
Rated: 3.5 by jskennedy from Virginia

Jan 27, 2012