Malted Milk Ball Imperial Porter
Perrin Brewing Co.

Malted Milk Ball Imperial PorterMalted Milk Ball Imperial Porter
Rate It
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Perrin Brewing Co.
 
Michigan, United States
Style:
Imperial Porter
Ranked #44
ABV:
12%
Score:
94
Ranked #2,083
Avg:
4.26 | pDev: 9.39%
Reviews:
25
Ratings:
145
Status:
Active
Rated:
Dec 12, 2021
Added:
Nov 26, 2013
Wants:
  30
Gots:
  24
SCORE
94
Outstanding
Malted Milk Ball Imperial PorterMalted Milk Ball Imperial Porter
Notes: This sophisticated ale was made with cacao nibs, malted milk and French Polynesian vanilla beans and aged for nine months in Woodford Reserve bourbon barrels. Malt Ball recently won a silver medal at the second largest barrel-aged beer festival in the country!
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Photo of BigIronH
Reviewed by BigIronH from Michigan

3.79/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75
Pours dark brown/Black with a finger of mocha foam, reducing to a ring and spotty lacing. Nose is vanilla, oak, raisin, and chocolate. Taste follows suit. As it warms it becomes a bit creamier but it really just maintains that base barrel character without ever fully morphing into the delicious malted milk ball treat I was expecting. Feel is silky smooth, velvety; not oily. Decent beer
Dec 12, 2021
Photo of DoctorZombies
Reviewed by DoctorZombies from Florida

4.22/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.25
Poured at 54°. Ruby brown/dark brown center; beige/khaki rocky/mixed bubbles head with impressive long cap retention; ultimately a large island of micro dots remains with a solid ring and bands of sudsy lace; no lace. Nose is bourbon, malted milk balls candy; bourbon in the retro nasal. Taste is Cacao, baker’s chocolate, bourbon, oak; vanilla in the middle; finish is malted milk and bourbon. Light body, moderate minus carbonation; no warmth from 12% abv. Overall, tasty and good looking BA Porter; super thin notwithstanding 12% and lactose dosing; good flavors now, I see no reason to age any further.
Nov 18, 2021
 
Rated: 4.29 by McHenry from Wisconsin

Jul 11, 2021
Photo of oberon
Reviewed by oberon from North Carolina

3.81/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
2020 Bottle.Pours a deep chocolate color with a slight reddish/brown tint,a thinner lighter beige head atop.Rather muted aromas of chocolate,sweet vanilla,and a touch of oak,nice enough but muted for the size of the beer.Flavors start out with heavy bourbon/vanilla then melds into chocolate and a boozy finish.As it warms more vanilla emerges and booze is tamed slightly.2020 bottle not up to par to the other?Not sure but this was a bit of a let down for me I hate to say.
Jun 22, 2021
Photo of WunderLlama
Reviewed by WunderLlama from Massachusetts

4.49/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
Bottle received in BIF12.5 Christmas edition from @whyteboar

Capped and taped large bottle poured into a snifter, one finger creamy taupe foam cap over a deep brown cola liquid. Micro carbonation streams are visible. Remarkable as those bottle was "injured" in transit despite the senders best efforts. Good retention, settles to a thin ringed layer. some lacings

Aroma is milk chocolate, vanilla, bourbon

Taste is cocoa, vanilla, bourbon taste with no heat

Mouthfeel is full, not syrupy, gentle sudsing, creamy , ABV is well hidden

Delicious beer, repeatable
Dec 14, 2020
 
Rated: 4.25 by paulish from New York

Jul 26, 2020
 
Rated: 4.02 by goblue30 from Michigan

Jul 07, 2020
 
Rated: 4.54 by chillin from Indiana

Jul 02, 2020
Photo of dd53grif
Reviewed by dd53grif from Michigan

4.28/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Cracked open the bottle from a 2018 Christmas gift that was kept in a cool, dark basement. Still tastes like it was brand new. Pours a black color with a tan head that disappears quickly. Aroma is chocolate, vanilla and caramel malts. Tastes of chocolate with a hint of vanilla and a good alcohol burn. Starts sweet but finishes with a slight hoppy bitterness. Good mouth feel. Excellent choice for a stay-at-home Saturday.
May 02, 2020
 
Rated: 4.35 by EMH73 from New York

Apr 19, 2020
 
Rated: 4.14 by DruC4 from Michigan

Mar 18, 2020
 
Rated: 4.27 by fthegiants from California

Feb 28, 2020
 
Rated: 4.28 by vabeerguy from Virginia

Jan 26, 2020
Photo of Tripel_Threat
Reviewed by Tripel_Threat from Michigan

4.28/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25
Very nice porter. Poured from bomber to snifter. Dark, cola liquid with a rim of khaki bubbles. Aromas of cocoa and cream, vanilla and light roast. Some barrel character shows in the flavor, but just an accent; it's mostly rich cocoa and sweet vanilla cream. Quite silky, medium full.
Nov 16, 2019
Photo of Jugs_McGhee
Reviewed by Jugs_McGhee from Louisiana

3/5  rDev -29.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Currently #45 in the Top Rated Michigan Beers list and #29 in the Top Rated American Imperial Porters list.

BOTTLE: Courtesy of Katelynn and Vince - thanks! 1 pint 6 fl oz brown glass bottle with a branded crown cap and an elegant gold & black label.

"Imperial Porter Aged in Oak Bourbon Barrels." "Ale made with cacao, vanilla, and lactose sugar." Aged in oak bourbon barrels for 9 months.

HEAD: ~1cm in height and pale khaki in colour, dying in less than a minute...not robust, but then I suppose that's to be expected in a 12% ABV brew. Leaves no lacing on the sides of the glass as it slowly recedes.

BODY: Opaque brown-black. No yeast/lees are visible.

Appears well (or perhaps slightly under?) carbonated. Generally appealing but not a stand-out appearance for an imperial porter. The gilded tan head found in the best expressions of the style is absent here.

AROMA: The vanillin of the bourbon barrel is evident, but I don't get bourbon's finer notes (e.g. toasted white oak, rich coconut) or barrel sugars/barrel char. Subdued scintillae of dark fruit. I don't know that I'd find lactose sugar if I approached this without knowing it was in there; it blends in seamlessly with the malt sweetness. The vanilla is similarly indistinguishable from the bourbon barrel vanillin; it's not so authentic that it's recognizably vanilla bean-derived. Cacao? It mixes with the chocolate malt.

Where the bourbon barrel should accentuate the additives and vice versa, they don't - one just replaces/eclipses the other, and it's the more rudimentary note in each case. I'd rather have rich cacao nibs evoked than mere chocolate malt,. actual vanilla bean than barrel vanilla, etc. (though judging by the implied sweetness of the aroma, this doesn't seem like it needed the lactose sugar at all).

I'm missing any bitterness contributors (e.g. roasted barley, coffee, hops), and it seems a bit too sweet as a result though it doesn't seem like a dessert beer.

Doesn't seem too warm alcohol-wise. I detect no off-notes.

Aromatic intensity is actually somewhat mild, at least for a 12% ABV bourbon barrel aged imperial porter with a bunch of additives.

Suggests an enjoyable imperial porter but not a top tier one.

TASTE & TEXTURE: Matching the aroma, the vanillin is the first thing I notice but it doesn't quite sing like I'd hope in a bourbon barrel aged vanilla bean brew. Beyond the vanillin and some vaguely dark fruit-evocative barrel sugars, I don't really get much from the bourbon barrel...no rich white oak, no barrel char, no coconut, no whiskey warmth; I expected more from a 9 month barrel aged beer. Doesn't compare to Founders or Dark Horse in terms of bourbon barrel notes, let alone to great executions thereof from outside its state.

A bit coarser than I expected, with the lactose giving it an almost chewy texture when coupled with the barrel sugars and what tastes like a yeasty sludgy sediment (though it's not as unpleasant as that description makes it sound). Wet, unrefreshing. Thick but not syrupy. Has adequate weight on the palate. Adequately carbonated. Not oily, gushed, hot, boozy, or otherwise overtly problematic, but it could do without the sedimentary feel and it does seem a bit on the heavy side given its merely moderate depth and intensity of flavour.

I don't taste any cacao/cocoa nibs...just chocolate malt. The lactose sugar sweetness is indeed unnecessary as I feared, injecting added sweetness where the dark malt backbone offered enough. It's too far towards the sweet end of the spectrum for my taste as a result, but that's not to say it's egregiously imbalanced or a saccharine chore to drink.

I guess I just want more balance and more flavour. Some barrel char and roasted barley would go a long way towards balancing this out with needed bitterness, and I'd like to see them ditch the lactose sugar and consider coffee, chicory, or some other similar additive that would impart bitterness instead of sweetness. Cacao nibs are wasted on this and it isn't as expressive bourbon-wise as you'd expect in a 9 month barrel aged brew. Choose a better bourbon I guess, age it longer, and/or ask Founders how they work their miracles?

OVERALL: They don't really deliver on the premise...this tastes less like malted milk balls/Whoppers than many a stout and porter I've tried that wasn't going for that specific flavour. It can't hold a candle to Founders' bourbon barrel beers, it's too sweet (but still drinkable), and doesn't deliver the goods when it comes to its adjunct/additives. It does hide its ABV well, but I think they threw a bunch of shit at a shoddy base beer hoping it would stick and unfortunately additives, adjuncts, lactose sugar, and barrel aging can't make up for a lackluster foundation.

I'd sooner drink Victory At Sea, which is available in the more approachable and more reasonably priced 12 fl oz format, but this is not a bad beer by any stretch. Still, it's a letdown from Perrin.

High C (3.00) / AVERAGE
Nov 09, 2019
Photo of Dustin_A_Stoutdrinker
Rated by Dustin_A_Stoutdrinker from Michigan

4.28/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25
Had it on tap, could have more head and true Porter thickness. Overall great flavor, chocolate front, bourbon middle with malty finish.
Oct 11, 2019
 
Rated: 4.25 by Danmullens1 from Wisconsin

May 05, 2019
Photo of Wolvmar
Reviewed by Wolvmar from Michigan

4.12/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
April 2019
Bomber, no date that I could find but pretty sure it’s a 2017 vintage as I think I bought two (see earlier 2017 review below). Poured into tulip glass.

Going to make this short as my experience this time is very consistent with the prior review.
Pour isn’t very impressive this time. Very little head, slight lacin.
Definite bourbon presence even after more aging. But not overdone, just right at the limit I like. Still plenty of chocolate and maybe milder vanilla as it’s not bothering me this time.
Maybe a little less of a full mouthfeel; even a bit watery feeling.
This beer is worth trying if you like big, boozy, chocolate BA beer.

=====

Fall 2018
Pour: bomber bought nearly a year ago (Fall 2017, I think). Poured into red solo cup :(. Dark brown, from what I could see. Nice tan head that lingers and left lots of lacing on the beautiful plastic cup.

Nose: vanilla, whisky, chocolate. Fairly pungent. Also wonderful plastic notes from the cup.

Taste: big chocolate; more dark than milk. Big vanilla that mellows and sweetens but is a bit much for me. Whisky next in line and not shy either. Traces of molasses, caramel, oak, and plastic.

Mouthfeel: really rich and viscous. This defines the milkshake feel. Moderate carbonation. Love it.

Overall: the plastic cup makes it tough to review. But, this is really big and good other than a bit to much vanilla for me. Would definitely try it agaIn, but in a proper vessel.
Apr 29, 2019
Photo of stortore
Reviewed by stortore from Illinois

3.97/5  rDev -6.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
22 ounce bottle into a snifter. Had 10/6/18.

Pours a dark brown, somewhat opaque, with a half inch quickly dissipating head and spotty, soapy cling. It really does smell pretty much like a malted milk ball. Aromas of cocoa, lactose, vanilla, chocolate, malt, marshmallow, some brown sugar. Didn’t notice any bourbon barrel. The taste is similar, but not as candy- like. Flavors of chocolate, vanilla, light bourbon- a bit more as it warms, malt, less lactose than the nose, some cocoa, light caramel. Smooth, a good medium to full body- although a touch thin feeling, well carbonated.

Not bad, but had higher expectations for this. Has a very good aroma, but there’s a lack of depth in the flavor. Barrels were minimal, as well. One of the rare times I liked a stout/porter less as I worked through the bottle.
Apr 16, 2019
 
Rated: 4.31 by NolaHopHead from Louisiana

Apr 03, 2019
 
Rated: 4 by Sammy from Canada (ON)

Mar 13, 2019
Photo of Hopheadjeffery
Reviewed by Hopheadjeffery from Illinois

4.15/5  rDev -2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4
Tasted in a snifter from draft at Consume on December 20, 2018. Brewed with lactose and spiced with vanilla and cacao nibs. Aged for 9 months in oak bourbon barrels.
Feb 07, 2019
 
Rated: 4.33 by Kuelsken from Michigan

Jan 29, 2019
 
Rated: 4.05 by Bammer21 from Illinois

Jan 16, 2019
Photo of 2beerdogs
Reviewed by 2beerdogs from California

3.89/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Thanks superspak. Record in NBS BIF #8
Dark brown, damn near black. Sandy to mocha colored head pushes nearly 2 fingers high, lingers, then slowly retreats to a thin cap. Little lacing.
Smell is lush. Combo of sweet: chocolate, caramel, fudge before it cools. Subtle roasted coffee comes through as well.
Taste follows in a more subdued way. As it warms you get a little more of the sweet flavors from the nose, but most of that is tapered by the roast, hints of wood, and the coffee notes. Hints of char, and maybe a smattering of bitter hops contribute to this drop in sweetness.
Mouthfeel is on the fuller side for a porter. Slight on the carbonation.
Overall, a very solid offering. I'd love it even more if the taste followed the nose more faithfully.
Jan 09, 2019
 
Rated: 4.61 by Berknerj from Illinois

Jan 02, 2019
 
Rated: 4.52 by Brooklyn_Beer from New York

Dec 23, 2018
Photo of REVZEB
Reviewed by REVZEB from Illinois

4.18/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25
Poured a thick black with receding brown bubbles. Smell had that sweet malt aroma, really nailed that aspect, with some slight vanilla, bourbon, wood and chocolate. Taste had this sweet chocolate cereal complexion, good but not as candy like as expected. Feel though had wonderful malt work, smooth viscous booze, and a dark finish that was lasting. The wife loved this one
Dec 11, 2018
 
Rated: 4.35 by Giggy from Michigan

Dec 05, 2018
 
Rated: 4.02 by bschmidt_37 from Illinois

Nov 22, 2018
Photo of darktronica
Reviewed by darktronica from Indiana

4.06/5  rDev -4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
When fresh out of the fridge, this really nails the concept of a malted milk ball candy, with the classic mix of chocolate, malt, vanilla, milk, and nougat notes. Minimal barrel character when chilled, considering the alleged 9 months of ageing. More starts to emerge as the beer warms, but this is also where some of the candy elements start to break down, in favor of sharper alcohol notes. On the whole, I prefer it cold, but this is still a bit of a novelty. Moderately thin body.
Nov 20, 2018
 
Rated: 3.33 by pagriley from Illinois

Nov 19, 2018
Photo of Midwest_beersnob
Rated by Midwest_beersnob from Indiana

4/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Not overly sweet, I was expecting more of a barrel flavor/ presence.
Nov 05, 2018
 
Rated: 4.35 by drstalker from Illinois

Oct 31, 2018
Photo of RaulMondesi
Reviewed by RaulMondesi from California

4.2/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.25
Man... here I am thinkin’, here I am drinkin’, and I almost don’t know! Raul gonna call this the Johnny Depp of beers cuz it’s kind of all over the place. “Ed Wood” - yeah, you know what? This thang tastes pretty damn good! “The Lone Ranger” - wtf is up with this insipid mouthfeel? And it makes Raul think: can you like and not like something at the same time? Nah, I ain’t gonna play Malted Milk like that. The mouth feel ain’t that bad, but like a Behati Prinsloo centerfold, I expect a lil more.

Still a great beer.
Oct 28, 2018
 
Rated: 4.04 by Sparky44 from Illinois

Oct 26, 2018
Photo of GuyFawkes
Reviewed by GuyFawkes from Illinois

3.9/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Released 9/8/18; drank 10/24/18 @ the Yarchives. Black/brown appearance. A violent pour yielded a nice khaki head; frothy lace. Caramel, autumn leaves & milk chocolate notes in the nose. Medium thick mouthfeel. Caramel, autumn leaves & cream flavors up front; milk chocolate & faint fresh earth notes on the finish. No booze heat. Too sweet, but that's understandable considering the intentions; overall, drinkable but not revelatory.
Oct 25, 2018
 
Rated: 4.53 by pstam87 from Illinois

Oct 12, 2018
 
Rated: 4.25 by drunkenmess from Michigan

Oct 08, 2018
 
Rated: 4.26 by Sauced4life from Michigan

Sep 23, 2018
Malted Milk Ball Imperial Porter from Perrin Brewing Co.
Beer rating: 94 out of 100 with 170 ratings