Fuzzy Traveler Peach Shandy
The Traveler Beer Co.
- From:
- The Traveler Beer Co.
- Vermont, United States
- Style:
- Fruit and Field Beer
- ABV:
- 4.4%
- Score:
- +9 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 4.07 | pDev: 0%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Oct 25, 2019
- Added:
- Feb 20, 2019
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by woodychandler from Pennsylvania
4.07/5 rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
4.07/5 rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
This is one of those beauty moments on The CANQuest (tm) wherein I get the add, get the approved pic & then get to be the first reviewer/rater! I live for this sort of thing & I have learned NOT to add a beer until I have an approved pic in place. It CAN CANtribute to the backlog, but things have oiled themselves up on both my & the site's ends so it all flows very smoothly.
From the CAN: "Quite a Refresher"; "Wheat Ale with Peach, Honey and Natural Flavors Added".
I was curious about this one, especially since it was marketed as both a "Wheat Ale" & a "Shandy", suggesting that it might need some in-CAN agitation before Crack!ing it open. I did just that, allowed it some settling time & then Crack!ed open the vent to begin an inverted Glug for the first time in a while. It did not disappoint in terms of its formation of just under two fingers of dense, foamy, rocky, bone-white head with moderate retention. However, the color as only a lightly-hazy Golden-Amber (SRM = > 5, < 7). After all of my efforts?!? 8=( Nose was really peachy, so points for truth in advertising! 8=) Yum! Mouthfeel was medium, actually kind of full for a Shandy. The taste was quite peachy, but not overly sweet, which was actually to its advantage from my POV. I generally eschew sweets so something that could have been overly sweet & was not gets my approval. Finish was semi-sweet, by no means close to dry, but very pleasant & very quaffable. YMMV.
Oct 25, 2019From the CAN: "Quite a Refresher"; "Wheat Ale with Peach, Honey and Natural Flavors Added".
I was curious about this one, especially since it was marketed as both a "Wheat Ale" & a "Shandy", suggesting that it might need some in-CAN agitation before Crack!ing it open. I did just that, allowed it some settling time & then Crack!ed open the vent to begin an inverted Glug for the first time in a while. It did not disappoint in terms of its formation of just under two fingers of dense, foamy, rocky, bone-white head with moderate retention. However, the color as only a lightly-hazy Golden-Amber (SRM = > 5, < 7). After all of my efforts?!? 8=( Nose was really peachy, so points for truth in advertising! 8=) Yum! Mouthfeel was medium, actually kind of full for a Shandy. The taste was quite peachy, but not overly sweet, which was actually to its advantage from my POV. I generally eschew sweets so something that could have been overly sweet & was not gets my approval. Finish was semi-sweet, by no means close to dry, but very pleasant & very quaffable. YMMV.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!