Bandit
Manor Hill Brewing
- From:
- Manor Hill Brewing
- Maryland, United States
- Style:
- Hazy Imperial IPA
- ABV:
- 7.7%
- Score:
- +8 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.92 | pDev: 5.82%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Inactive
- Rated:
- Jan 05, 2021
- Added:
- Nov 21, 2020
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Ozzylizard from Pennsylvania
3.09/5 rDev +5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
3.09/5 rDev +5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Bandit from Manor Hill Brewing. Purchased 10/11/20 for $ 4.43 (Including tax and discount) for 16 oz can ($ 0.277/oz) from State Line Liquors in Elkton, MD. Reviewed 5/1/21.
Bottom of can marked “FOUR OUTTA 4 9/28/2020”. On room temperature shelf at store and stored at home at 42 degrees. Served at 45 degrees in a hand washed and dried Jester King snifter. Final temperature 51.2 degrees.
Appearance – 3.5.
First pour – Straw (SRM 3), hazy.
Body – Straw (SRM 3), murky. When held to direct light, same.
Head – Average (Maximum 3.5 cm, aggressive center pour), antique white, medium density, short retention, leaving a five to seven mm crown and a thin complete cap.
Lacing – Good. Tight bands of very tiny bubbles with short stalactites and connecting columns.
Aroma – 3.25 – Begins with weak tropical fruit, a little malt, and no yeast.
Flavor – 3 – Begins slightly bitter with a touch of apricot, no malt, no yeast. No alcohol (7.7 % ABV, as marked on container) found in either nose or taste. Gastric warming does not occur. No dimethylsulfide or diacetyl. Apricot grows stronger and bitterer.
Palate – 3 – Medium, watery, soft carbonation.
Final impression and summation: 3 Nasty. The licorice that @BBThunderbolt noted would have been a definite plus as would some diacetyl.
Jan 05, 2021Bottom of can marked “FOUR OUTTA 4 9/28/2020”. On room temperature shelf at store and stored at home at 42 degrees. Served at 45 degrees in a hand washed and dried Jester King snifter. Final temperature 51.2 degrees.
Appearance – 3.5.
First pour – Straw (SRM 3), hazy.
Body – Straw (SRM 3), murky. When held to direct light, same.
Head – Average (Maximum 3.5 cm, aggressive center pour), antique white, medium density, short retention, leaving a five to seven mm crown and a thin complete cap.
Lacing – Good. Tight bands of very tiny bubbles with short stalactites and connecting columns.
Aroma – 3.25 – Begins with weak tropical fruit, a little malt, and no yeast.
Flavor – 3 – Begins slightly bitter with a touch of apricot, no malt, no yeast. No alcohol (7.7 % ABV, as marked on container) found in either nose or taste. Gastric warming does not occur. No dimethylsulfide or diacetyl. Apricot grows stronger and bitterer.
Palate – 3 – Medium, watery, soft carbonation.
Final impression and summation: 3 Nasty. The licorice that @BBThunderbolt noted would have been a definite plus as would some diacetyl.
Reviewed by BBThunderbolt from Kiribati
2.75/5 rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75
2.75/5 rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75
Thanks to Ozzylizard for this one, from a LIF during NBS BIF #12. 16oz can (dated 9/28/20) poured into 14oz teku. Poured a muddy dark orange color with about 1/3 inch of white head that had low retention and no lacing.
The aroma was that of a basic murkbomb; frooty hops, no malt or yeast aspects.
On the tongue, it started out similar, but had a sharp licorice taste on the finish that was really out of place. And, as I drank through the glass, that licorice became stronger.
The body was the typical light of the style, and had a medium finish.
Drinkability suffered due to that licorice, but was otherwise average for the style.
Overall, an average-ish version of the style, but for that damn licorice. YMMV.
Nov 21, 2020The aroma was that of a basic murkbomb; frooty hops, no malt or yeast aspects.
On the tongue, it started out similar, but had a sharp licorice taste on the finish that was really out of place. And, as I drank through the glass, that licorice became stronger.
The body was the typical light of the style, and had a medium finish.
Drinkability suffered due to that licorice, but was otherwise average for the style.
Overall, an average-ish version of the style, but for that damn licorice. YMMV.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!