Sleeman Silver Creek Lager
Sleeman Breweries Ltd.

Sleeman Silver Creek LagerSleeman Silver Creek Lager
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Sleeman Breweries Ltd.
 
Ontario, Canada
Style:
American Lager
Ranked #480
ABV:
5%
Score:
64
Ranked #39,735
Avg:
2.6 | pDev: 20.38%
Ratings:
86 | reviews: 38
Status:
Active
Rated:
Mar 14, 2023
Added:
Nov 30, 2002
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  17
Sleeman Silver Creek Lager is brewed in our copper kettles for a traditional pilsner style. We gave it extra body to ensure you would enjoy extra smoothness.
View: More Beers
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
 
Rated: 2.69 by Roberto11232 from New York

Mar 14, 2023
 
Rated: 2.47 by LesDewitt4beer from Minnesota

Oct 29, 2021
Photo of taxandbeerguy
Reviewed by taxandbeerguy from Canada (ON)

2.98/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
355 ml can. Part of Sleeman's mixed 6. Served cold into a pint glass.

Appearance - Pale golden straw colored beer. Good expressive carbonation and a finger plus of head that has some staying power.

Smell - Quite a bit of grainy notes and some cooked veggies. Not unpleasant and more aromatic than expected but doesn't inspire confidence either.

Taste - Strangely flavored, nothing off, but there's not really any grain. Very watery. Not unpleasant but not great either.

Mouthfeel - Clean and somewhat crisp, carbonation is pretty intense, yet there's a sensation of this going down so so easily.

Overall - Better than I thought it'd be, but not great, Gassy but goes down surprisingly easy.
Dec 01, 2019
Photo of TheBierdimpfe
Reviewed by TheBierdimpfe from Canada (QC)

3.5/5  rDev +34.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Medium: Capped, Pils glass.
Opacity: Bright with a faint mist of minerals.
Color: Almost golden with low activity.
Head: Slightly foamy 1-2 finger.
Legs: Decent, okay swirl reaction.
Smell: Cabbage/Minerals.
Taste: Barley/Floral.
Feel: Cereal/Noble hops.
Body: Medium slick.
Carbonation: Prickly.
Overall: Feels like a German Pils, does the job well, not much adjuncts. Pretty good quality, probably the best one they brew.

Visual 6/10 - Flavors 6/10 - Sensations 6/10 - Balance 7/10 -
Freshness 8/10 - Intensity 5/10 - Complexity 6/10 - Appreciation 6.5/10
Apr 17, 2019
 
Rated: 3 by toddsschneider from Canada (QC)

Jul 12, 2018
 
Rated: 2.75 by marker2525 from Florida

Jun 19, 2018
 
Rated: 2.87 by Isaac_L95 from Canada (ON)

Jul 02, 2016
 
Rated: 2.39 by MilkLeg from Canada (AB)

Jun 06, 2016
Photo of biegaman
Reviewed by biegaman from Canada (ON)

2.48/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25
Regardless of the name on the label, virtually all of Sleeman's core brands look the same. Silver Creek Lager is no different: light yellow in colour, with an antiseptically clean complexion, and bubbles so plentiful yet entirely ineffective that they must be artificial (they can't sustain a proper head).

There's a certain characteristic that from day one I've noted in all Sleeman products; it's especially prominent in the aroma. It's been many years since I've last had an offering of theirs but I still feel confident I could pick them out in a lineup with other mass-produced domestic brand lagers.

Now I realize it must be the brand of corn syrup they use. This sweet, stenchy, skunky note has an industrial ring to it, a synthetic flavour that is markedly different from the wholesome, toasty graininess of actual malted barley. This taste is more like canned corn kernels and is unpleasant, even off-putting.

The one thing I hear in defense of large commercial breweries is that they're consistent; like McDonalds, their beer taste the same everywhere. You always know what you're getting. To replicate a fermented product like beer to the same standards time and time again on a massive scale isn't easy. This is true.

But who wants to make shitty beer? And who wants to drink shitty beer? I tasted my first Silver Creek Lager over a decade ago and it was just as insipid then as it is now. That's an impressive feat but not one I think worthy of commending. Consistency is a good attribute - quality is a better one.

The folks at Sleeman aren't dummies. They've left this recipe the same for good reason: it sells. This lager may be an injustice to the Czech and German ones that originally inspired it but, sorry to say, its bland, sweet, light-bodied and firmly carbonated qualities are exactly what most consumers look for.
Dec 29, 2015
Photo of Eric_Standard
Reviewed by Eric_Standard from Canada (BC)

2.68/5  rDev +3.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75
A: Golden, light, active carbonation. White head.
S: Apple, skunk, corn. Mild.
T: Apple, mild bread, corny. Mild sweetness, pleasant bitterness.
F: Crisp and bright, but just slightly over carbonated.
O: Inoffensive but unremarkable. I wouldn't avoid it, but I wouldn't seek it out either.
Nov 30, 2015
Photo of fortyfield
Reviewed by fortyfield from Canada (ON)

2.56/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75
A - Pale straw colour. Good deal of carbonation. Head fades quickly with no real lacing.

S - A slight skunky smell at the beginning, with an apple scent as well. Almost has a cider-like sweet smell, but not in an appealing sense when I'm about to drink a lager.

T - More of the apple like smell, but the taste is fortunately not as sweet. Slightly bitter aftertaste, though no real hop presence. A bit of a musty taste at the very end as well.

F - Carbonation is appropriate for the style. Fairly crisp and refreshing.

O - Overall slightly unimpressed with this one, not that I had overly high expectations. I think I can say this is my least favourite Sleeman product, and I'm not typically a big fan of the company either. I haven't had the Light or the Original Draught in a while, but from what I remember I enjoyed them both slightly more. However, it is still a serviceable lager that could be consumed in large amounts, and the unappealing factors would likely diminish after the first 2 or 3.
Sep 11, 2015
 
Rated: 2.88 by JPNesker from Canada (ON)

Aug 21, 2015
Photo of papat444
Rated by papat444 from Canada (QC)

2.5/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
Flashback #309
Aug 19, 2015
 
Rated: 2.94 by ElGallo from New Hampshire

Jul 31, 2015
 
Rated: 2.55 by headlessparrot from Canada (ON)

Jul 24, 2015
 
Rated: 3.41 by Electros from Canada (ON)

May 22, 2015
 
Rated: 2.58 by djsnowman06 from Canada ()

Apr 03, 2015
 
Rated: 2.5 by DaveMiller from Minnesota

Apr 01, 2015
 
Rated: 2.6 by Cycle69 from Canada (ON)

Mar 30, 2015
 
Rated: 2.26 by CRObighit2 from Canada (ON)

Mar 06, 2015