The Fragile Kind
Aslin Beer Company

The Fragile KindThe Fragile Kind
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Aslin Beer Company
 
Virginia, United States
Style:
Czech / Bohemian Pilsner
Ranked #104
ABV:
4.7%
Score:
88
Ranked #19,996
Avg:
3.93 | pDev: 7.38%
Ratings:
22 | reviews: 9
Status:
Active
Rated:
Mar 02, 2024
Added:
Sep 23, 2019
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  0
The Fragile Kind is hopped with Saaz, and has a clear pale color with a cloud-like head. The aroma is clean with a rich sense of malt and spice. Flavor follows the nose with a light-to-medium hop presence. The finish is crisp and clean!
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
 
Rated: 3.87 by Boone757 from Virginia

Mar 02, 2024
 
Rated: 4.09 by Nitty703 from Virginia

May 22, 2022
 
Rated: 4 by Azpittil57 from Arizona

Apr 12, 2022
 
Rated: 3.89 by SierraFlight from Virginia

Mar 19, 2022
Photo of Whyteboar
Reviewed by Whyteboar from Michigan

3.94/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4
The pour was honey gold in color and either unfiltered or a very light haze. The head was a good 2 fingers of near white foam which settled quickly.
The aroma was slight biscuit malts and a touch or spice, like black pepper. Don't know why that works in a beer, but it does for me.
the taste follows, with the addition of some very faint grassy herbal hops, or what I assumed were hops. But malts definitely take the lead here.
The feel perplexed me; it wasn't bad in any way, just not a crisp texture, more soft than crisp. For most ales, I'd rate that near ideal, but for this, not so much. Didn't spoil the drink for me though!
OA, glad I tried it, for the price point I probably won't return too frequently.
Mar 15, 2022
 
Rated: 4 by paulish from New York

Feb 21, 2022
 
Rated: 4.5 by redfox405 from Virginia

Feb 05, 2022
Photo of brewerburgundy
Reviewed by brewerburgundy from West Virginia

3.93/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
On tap in Alexandria.

Pale gold, delicate white head with some big bubbles and draped lacing.

Big pilsner malt notes. Kind of soft nose with all the pils characteristics, but none of the crisp, hard edges.

Bready, lots of pils malt, very clean. Nice medium-high bitterness that makes it bitingly refreshing.

Love the body on this. Full, but light. Great biting medium carbonation.

Best beer I’ve had from Aslin so far.
Sep 01, 2021
Photo of TemptNBag
Reviewed by TemptNBag from Virginia

3.53/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
A good, solid Pilsner. Smooth and drinkable, just bitter enough, notes of fruity hops, a very pleasant aftertaste and a bitter echo at the back of the tongue. It's got slightly more heft to it than what you might be looking for in a quaffable summer pils, but that's not to its discredit. It's good.
Aug 24, 2021
Photo of BeerAndGasMasks
Reviewed by BeerAndGasMasks from Virginia

3.95/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
From the can, it pours a nice ever so slightly hazy golden yellow color with a nice white head that lasts a while and leaves lacing. In the nose, it is pleasantly herbal. In the mouth, it is mildly pilsner bitter with a lingering slight bitterness that enhances the overall experience. Nice!
Jan 23, 2021
 
Rated: 4.03 by The_Kriek_Freak from Greenland

Sep 27, 2020
 
Rated: 4.13 by ummswimmin from New Jersey

Jun 21, 2020
Photo of metter98
Reviewed by metter98 from New York

3.82/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
A: The beer is hazy yellow in color and has a moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a short white head that left lots of small specks of bubbles on the surface and lacing down the sides of the glass.
S: Light to moderate aromas of grassy and herbal hops are present in the nose.
T: The taste follows the smell and is mostly dominated by grassy and herbal flavors from the Saaz hops, which also contribute a light amount of bitterness.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied and clean on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: I liked how this pilsner seemed to be very delicate but still had nice aromas and flavors of Saaz hops. It is very easy to drink.

Serving type: can
Jun 18, 2020
 
Rated: 4.32 by MICAMD from Maryland

Jun 08, 2020
 
Rated: 3.89 by MGibbons from Maryland

Jun 05, 2020
Photo of cjgiant
Reviewed by cjgiant from District of Columbia

3.57/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5
Can, no date:
Pours a little between gold and straw from the can. A little more straw than gold in the body, with a haze that makes the pink shadow of my finger tints the beer slightly as I go to grab it. A pillowy white to slightly off-white head isn't shy on the pour, and it crumbles away to sponginess, including some spongy blobs left upon the glass.

Nose has a nice bread note to it a mix of grain and yeast and perhaps a little hay. The malts control the nose, and about the only other note is a light indistinct fruit note - maybe something from an orchard.

Taste brings to the palate what the aroma brought to the nose - a light bread, near white but with a hint of grain, the latter perhaps baked into the crust. There's a little sweetness that makes the beer lean towards the white bread. Perhaps it's this sweetness that adds some smoothness to the beer. This feel comes at the cost of a drier, cleaner beer, however - all components I am looking for a bit more of from a Czech Pils.
Revisit: a week later my next can had a grassy hop note I didn't get much of in my original review. This was more prominent on a colder beer, oddly, but seemed to mix with the fruity aspects as the bottom of the glass warmed up. Either way, adjusted taste (and feel, since it wasn't coming across as thick) up a tad.

Another thing I am looking for is a spicy hop bitterness - and that is missing here. There is a light grassy bitterness, but the indistinct fruit note from the nose is a bit more like a red delicious apple in the taste. These balance each other in the second part of the taste to a near draw (a little fruit skin and grass edge laces the end notes).

There's some nice initial marks for this beer with the head, nose, and opening flavor, but the rest of the beer is fairly lacking in makeup. It's a bready, fairly balanced, smooth Pilsner that isn't hard to drink, but doesn't really scratch a Bohemian itch for me, mainly due to the lack of a cirsp, sipcy hop back-end. I apparently liked Anthemic considerably better.
May 24, 2020
 
Rated: 4 by Sludgeman from District of Columbia

Mar 21, 2020
Photo of thebeers
Reviewed by thebeers from Pennsylvania

3.03/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.75
Clear straw with low effervescence and a thin near-white head. Heavy webbed lacing. Sort of a cakey aroma with some light floral hops. A strange, intense herbal quality (sweet, dark) dominates the taste. Maybe a little mahlab? Moderately-strong grassy bitterness mixes in the aftertaste with the cherry-herb thing. Medium bodied for the style with zippy carbonation. This beer is a mess. No canned on date.
Nov 24, 2019
Photo of smcolw
Reviewed by smcolw from Massachusetts

3.68/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Straw to gold color with the lightest of hazes. Small but lasting head. Excellent ring lacing throughout the tasting.

Pleasant combination of clean, very pale malt and light noble hops. There's a bit of spilt beer--brewery floor in the background.

The flavor is dry, with little to no malt sweetness. This makes the hop seem more potent than it really is. The body and carbonation are as one expects from the style. The swallow is but not from hop bitterness, more from the nearly astringent malt base. Shorter aftertaste.
Nov 17, 2019
 
Rated: 3.84 by nmann08 from Virginia

Oct 26, 2019