Kplus Pivo
Pivovarna Laško


- From:
- Pivovarna Laško
- Slovenia
- Style:
- European Pale Lager
Ranked #550 - ABV:
- 4%
- Score:
- 68
Ranked #39,517 - Avg:
- 2.08 | pDev: 29.33%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 6
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Sep 26, 2023
- Added:
- Jan 09, 2012
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 1
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by johnnnniee from New Hampshire
2.68/5 rDev +28.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
2.68/5 rDev +28.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
Can from the supermarket in Dubrovnik I thought it was from Slovenia
Pale yellow with a decent sized bubbly white head that persists. Typical pale macro larger
Sep 26, 2023Pale yellow with a decent sized bubbly white head that persists. Typical pale macro larger
Reviewed by Jugs_McGhee from Texas
3.04/5 rDev +46.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
3.04/5 rDev +46.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
.5 litre green can purchased at a Mercator supermarket (outside Slovenia). Cost was 0.60 euros.
It's an above average refreshing supermarket lager bereft of the usual metallic and/or buttery diacetyl off-flavours, with a clean barley/Pilsner malt backbone, generic minimal hopping (a bit of grass and that's it), and a light body. Not watery or thin.
It pairs well with food, it's cheap, and in high quantities it will impart intoxication. Unremarkable albeit drinkable, this is a brew I'd return to over many other beers in its price point and market category. But it won't impress anyone.
C+ (3.04) / ABOVE AVERAGE
Feb 10, 2016It's an above average refreshing supermarket lager bereft of the usual metallic and/or buttery diacetyl off-flavours, with a clean barley/Pilsner malt backbone, generic minimal hopping (a bit of grass and that's it), and a light body. Not watery or thin.
It pairs well with food, it's cheap, and in high quantities it will impart intoxication. Unremarkable albeit drinkable, this is a brew I'd return to over many other beers in its price point and market category. But it won't impress anyone.
C+ (3.04) / ABOVE AVERAGE
Reviewed by flyingpig from Scotland
1.87/5 rDev -10.1%
look: 1.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2
1.87/5 rDev -10.1%
look: 1.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2
500ml Can from Konzum, Zagreb (5.49 kuna):
This was a very cheap & boring beer, thankfully it feel short of being nasty but it wasn't a great one by any stretch of the imagination. Full of cheap adjuncts & corn, there wasn't really much going for it at all other than hinting at some grassy hops. Definitely not the worst lager I've ever tried but at the same time I'll not be looking to try it again.
Sep 04, 2015This was a very cheap & boring beer, thankfully it feel short of being nasty but it wasn't a great one by any stretch of the imagination. Full of cheap adjuncts & corn, there wasn't really much going for it at all other than hinting at some grassy hops. Definitely not the worst lager I've ever tried but at the same time I'll not be looking to try it again.
Reviewed by REVZEB from Illinois
2.18/5 rDev +4.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25
2.18/5 rDev +4.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25
Mostly clear gold body with a sudsy white head that fades quickly. Sweet corn adjuncts, cheap pilsner malt, skunkiness, urine, grains and slight metal. Taste is bland malt, euro macro adjuncts and metal. Feel is typical euro adjunct lager, decent carbonation, and very skunky. This is not a good beer
May 05, 2013Reviewed by StonedTrippin from Colorado
2.08/5 rDev 0%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2
2.08/5 rDev 0%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2
this is not nice. its a generic beer brand here brewed for a chain of grocery stores. the moderately cheaper price does not justify purchasing this, although its not as miserable as i suspected it would be. still might take it over a budlight on principle. pours clear and overly carbonated, diluted pee color. smells like a glass of water almost, just a faint hint of pale malt in there, but man this is odorless. flavor is equally absent, although i suppose that limits its repulsiveness. just doesnt taste like much, except for an acidic and tart aftertaste, theres not much happening. mouthfeel is like a soda, tons of carbonation leaves you gassy, and at 4% i wouldnt drink enough of these to get a buzz under any circumstances... well... almost any. bad, but not as bad as i thought itd be, but dont try this just to review it, as i did. there is nothing new to contribute here.
Aug 06, 2012Reviewed by djura from Serbia
2.48/5 rDev +19.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2
2.48/5 rDev +19.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2
Don't know why am i reviewing this one,but someone must do it.
This is made in Lasko for Croatian supermarket Konzum. So it is like Tesco lager and similar market beers.
It is cheap lager,maybe little more above average for this kind of product.
Golden color,white foam,bubbling's lasting for few minutes,skunky smell and taste.
Overall-It is supermarket beer,so it taste's as you could expect it..
Jan 09, 2012This is made in Lasko for Croatian supermarket Konzum. So it is like Tesco lager and similar market beers.
It is cheap lager,maybe little more above average for this kind of product.
Golden color,white foam,bubbling's lasting for few minutes,skunky smell and taste.
Overall-It is supermarket beer,so it taste's as you could expect it..
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!