Labatt Sterling
Labatt Brewing Company Ltd.


- From:
- Labatt Brewing Company Ltd.
- Ontario, Canada
- Style:
- Light Lager
- ABV:
- 4%
- Score:
- 71
- Avg:
- 2.37 | pDev: 26.16%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 8
- Status:
- Inactive
- Rated:
- Jun 16, 2013
- Added:
- Jan 19, 2004
- Wants:
- 1
- Gots:
- 0
With only 88 calories per 341 ml bottle, Labatt Sterling is a light, refreshing beer with 1/3 less calories than regular beers. In other words, it's a great tasting beer...that won't slow you down.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by plaid75 from New York
2.66/5 rDev +12.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
2.66/5 rDev +12.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Poured a medium straw hue with a one finger foamy white head. There was decent retention and lacing.
The smell featured a sweet adjunct and slight grassy hop.
The taste featured a raw grainy malt with a lingering corn sweetness.
The mouthfeel was light for the style with vigorous carbonation.
Overall a lower level light lager. Not recommended.
Aug 08, 2010The smell featured a sweet adjunct and slight grassy hop.
The taste featured a raw grainy malt with a lingering corn sweetness.
The mouthfeel was light for the style with vigorous carbonation.
Overall a lower level light lager. Not recommended.
Reviewed by dnichols from Washington
2.01/5 rDev -15.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
2.01/5 rDev -15.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
A: It poured a faint straw yell with a moderate half finger white head that fell fast and then dissipated completely. There were a few small and scattered clumps of leggy lacing.
S: It had faint aromas of grains and hops but it was hard to ellicit any distinct smells.
T: It had a diluted flavor profile common to light lagers. There were hints of toasted sweet malts but nothing that really coated the tongue and there was a musty tangy bite on the back of the tongue that could have been hops.
M: It was very light bodied, almost like water. It had a massive amount of carbonation. It finished west with a bit of musty aftertaste.
D: IT is a light, low ABV brew that could support a long session with few affects but why do it. It lacks flavor, a defining character, or other attributes that make it a beer to seek and enjoy.
Nov 02, 2008S: It had faint aromas of grains and hops but it was hard to ellicit any distinct smells.
T: It had a diluted flavor profile common to light lagers. There were hints of toasted sweet malts but nothing that really coated the tongue and there was a musty tangy bite on the back of the tongue that could have been hops.
M: It was very light bodied, almost like water. It had a massive amount of carbonation. It finished west with a bit of musty aftertaste.
D: IT is a light, low ABV brew that could support a long session with few affects but why do it. It lacks flavor, a defining character, or other attributes that make it a beer to seek and enjoy.
Reviewed by BigBry from Canada (AB)
2.35/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
2.35/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
355 ml can, really just want the 'new' can for my collection, but might as well try the contents as well.
Labatt's effort at jumping in to the low carb trend. Pale yellow in color, very little head or foam, almost fizzy . Really is just watered down Labatt's Lite. Have seen it on tap a number of places so their marketing must be working, the beer sure doesn't. NO thanks, I'll pass on this one
Oct 12, 2004Labatt's effort at jumping in to the low carb trend. Pale yellow in color, very little head or foam, almost fizzy . Really is just watered down Labatt's Lite. Have seen it on tap a number of places so their marketing must be working, the beer sure doesn't. NO thanks, I'll pass on this one
Reviewed by tatterdash from Canada (ON)
2/5 rDev -15.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
2/5 rDev -15.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
Had this when I was counting carbs, I think I'll just eat less and drink more. It was and unimpressive clear yellow with fizzy head that was gone in the blink of an eye. Smell was a bit of hops, faint, very faint. Taste was a bit of sweet malt and finish that was water... yep, just water. It was rather over-carbonated as well. While I will never pour a beer out no matter how bad it is (I am bit of a masochist in that regard), and although I could conceivably drink this all day, it is rather like the beer equivilent of eating celery... kind of a waste of time.
Oct 12, 2004Reviewed by Sammy from Canada (ON)
2.17/5 rDev -8.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
2.17/5 rDev -8.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
Looks like you-know-what. No head. Some malt, higher than their average taste. Carbonation not hops. Was watery, but not the most watery I' have had. Then again, it was a hot day and a long walk and I was thirsty. Is this a low carb? OK, possible sweeter than Sleeman clear, I guess from corn sweetener.
Jun 23, 2004Reviewed by TerryW from Canada (ON)
1.49/5 rDev -37.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1
1.49/5 rDev -37.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1
Golden yellow with a big white head. Actually gave up some good lace.
That's it though. Doesn't smell like anything. Doesn't taste like anything. Fizzy. Real fizzy.
So. Not actively dislikable, but no particular point to this beer.
Light strikes again. Believe I'll stick with the dark side.
Feb 14, 2004That's it though. Doesn't smell like anything. Doesn't taste like anything. Fizzy. Real fizzy.
So. Not actively dislikable, but no particular point to this beer.
Light strikes again. Believe I'll stick with the dark side.
Reviewed by Shiloh from Canada (ON)
2.35/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
2.35/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
If in a blind taste test, I could not tell the difference between this Labatt Sterling and a Bud Light.
Shortly after arrival this product looked like a thin pale apple juice.
Light golden colour, no froth of any description and extremly light carbonation.
Nose was clean.
Body was very thin.
The taste was fairly well balanced with a slight finish to the malts.
Brewed to the yuppie diet beer,complete with foil neck ring.
Feb 08, 2004Shortly after arrival this product looked like a thin pale apple juice.
Light golden colour, no froth of any description and extremly light carbonation.
Nose was clean.
Body was very thin.
The taste was fairly well balanced with a slight finish to the malts.
Brewed to the yuppie diet beer,complete with foil neck ring.
Reviewed by slitherySOB from Canada (ON)
1.82/5 rDev -23.2%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5
1.82/5 rDev -23.2%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5
One of my billiard tournaments was having a promo of this. Since I was competing, I got to drink this for free. Somehow, I still feel ripped off. This is one of these Atkin diet beers, low in carbs, calories and high in water. 2.5 carbs per bottle. Ooh, should I be impressed? Poured a fizzy, light yellow colour. Think watered down lemonade that kids sell during the summer months. No head whatsoever. I even brought a bottle home to see if pouring it properly made a difference. Nope, it didn't. Flat pepsi has better head than this. Very faint corn smell. And I do mean faint. Taste? Umm, if you really force your tongue, some dry sweetness is detected. Thin, watery mouthfeel. Definitely drinkable, because it's basically water. A fad beer for a fad diet.
Jan 19, 2004
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!