DB
Coopers Brewery Limited

- From:
- Coopers Brewery Limited
- Australia
- Style:
- European Pale Lager
- ABV:
- 4.4%
- Score:
- +9 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.36 | pDev: 0%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jul 12, 2005
- Added:
- Jul 12, 2005
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Weizenmensch from Japan
2.36/5 rDev 0%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4
2.36/5 rDev 0%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4
Nowhere on the label does it state that DB is code for 'diabetic beer', but that's my inkling of why this otherwise below average lager exists. The label implies that DB stands for 'dry brewed', and is dry because a double pitching of yeast and subsequent extended fermentation eliminates sugars and thus forms a dry taste. I'm reviewing this as a Euro Pale Lager for want of anything closer.
Appearance: Gold, low-medium head retention, lots of sticky lacing, low carbonation.
Smell: A bit skunky, even thought it's dated best before 11/12/05. Unfermented malt smell. Strong, unpleasant brewery odour. Not very good.
Taste: Quite refreshing, an unusual malty smell on the palate. Dry as stated, thinly malty, tolerable if you can't drink the normal stuff. An interesting taste, I guess - no chemical adjunct/sulfite taste, pretty drinkable. Tastes genuine but isn't great. Good for the macro style, but not a great beer.
Mouthfeel: A bit like a homebrew. Low gravity finish effect. Thin.
Drinkability: Not bad. If I were at a party, and diabetic, I'd get pissed on this.
Jul 12, 2005Appearance: Gold, low-medium head retention, lots of sticky lacing, low carbonation.
Smell: A bit skunky, even thought it's dated best before 11/12/05. Unfermented malt smell. Strong, unpleasant brewery odour. Not very good.
Taste: Quite refreshing, an unusual malty smell on the palate. Dry as stated, thinly malty, tolerable if you can't drink the normal stuff. An interesting taste, I guess - no chemical adjunct/sulfite taste, pretty drinkable. Tastes genuine but isn't great. Good for the macro style, but not a great beer.
Mouthfeel: A bit like a homebrew. Low gravity finish effect. Thin.
Drinkability: Not bad. If I were at a party, and diabetic, I'd get pissed on this.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!