Zhigulovskoye
Kolos OAO/ Ledyanoy Stakanchik
- From:
- Kolos OAO/ Ledyanoy Stakanchik
- Russia
- Style:
- European Pale Lager
- ABV:
- 4%
- Score:
- +8 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.15 | pDev: 17.67%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Mar 28, 2008
- Added:
- Jul 26, 2003
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by MaltyGoodness from Pennsylvania
2.53/5 rDev +17.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3
2.53/5 rDev +17.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3
16.9 oz bottle
Pours a pale straw color with a small white head that maintains. Minor lacing on the glass.
Faint aroma of pilsner malt with just a bit of herbal hops.
Very weak pilsner malt taste upfront with a mild sweetness. Faint herbal hop taste and mild bitterness. Finishes clean and bland.
Thin body, ample carbonation.
Well, for $2 this is about what I expected. Easy enough to slug down, as nothing about this beer is meant to be savored.
Mar 28, 2008Pours a pale straw color with a small white head that maintains. Minor lacing on the glass.
Faint aroma of pilsner malt with just a bit of herbal hops.
Very weak pilsner malt taste upfront with a mild sweetness. Faint herbal hop taste and mild bitterness. Finishes clean and bland.
Thin body, ample carbonation.
Well, for $2 this is about what I expected. Easy enough to slug down, as nothing about this beer is meant to be savored.
Reviewed by Globetrotter from Virginia
1.78/5 rDev -17.2%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5
1.78/5 rDev -17.2%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5
Came in a brown half liter bottle with a good looking multi-colored label. Ingredients conform to the purity law. Expiration date was 10/8/03, I opened it on 7/26/03.
A standard pour produced a horrible thin white head with huge bubbles. Fortunately, I didn't have to look at that head for long. The liquid itself was a reasonably healthy golden hue, but oh that head! The nose was nasty - iodine, sulfur and bad fruit. The mouth was flat and sweetish. The initial taste was medicinal - acidic, sour, syrupy. I was stunned to note a fairly nice hop finish after all that nastiness. The aftertaste retained a bit of the bitterness, but far more of the sour sweetness.
I suspect that this was a bad bottle, as I don't remember the on tap version I had before becoming a BA as being this bad. Or, perhaps, I'm just more sober now...
Jul 26, 2003A standard pour produced a horrible thin white head with huge bubbles. Fortunately, I didn't have to look at that head for long. The liquid itself was a reasonably healthy golden hue, but oh that head! The nose was nasty - iodine, sulfur and bad fruit. The mouth was flat and sweetish. The initial taste was medicinal - acidic, sour, syrupy. I was stunned to note a fairly nice hop finish after all that nastiness. The aftertaste retained a bit of the bitterness, but far more of the sour sweetness.
I suspect that this was a bad bottle, as I don't remember the on tap version I had before becoming a BA as being this bad. Or, perhaps, I'm just more sober now...
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!