Averagely Perfect Saison - Poll #23 - Mash Type

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by VikeMan, Feb 10, 2015.

Tags:
?

Select a Mash Type

Poll closed Feb 12, 2015.
  1. Single Infusion (Saccharification Rest), no Mashout

    48.1%
  2. Protein Rest plus Saccharification Rest, no Mashout

    3.8%
  3. Saccharification Rest plus Mashout

    46.2%
  4. Protein Rest, Saccharification, and Mashout

    1.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    The previous poll (#22) determined a recommended starter size of 0.5 liters for the WLP644.

    Before we get to specific mash temperature(s), this poll (#23) will determine the recommended type of mash.

    This is a straight plurality poll. If your first choice is losing miserably, consider jumping ship to your second choice. There will be no write-ins...this poll contains the mash type(s) that were recommended in the sidebar poll.

    I recommend you think about this in terms of not only your personal preferences, but also in the context of the recipe so far. I strongly suspect many folks have not made a beer quite like this recipe (so far) before, so please discuss the options at length.

    This poll will be open for 48 hours.

    (For those who don't know what I'm talking about, see these threads for the first two beers we did (and the bazillion ensuing polls and the final recipes...
    http://beeradvocate.com/community/threads/the-averagely-perfect-american-ipa-project.59552/
    http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/averagely-perfect-american-stout-poll-1-abv.131209/ )

    Issues with methodology? Take 'em to beermail please.

    The Averagely Perfect Saison so far...

    Batch Size: 5 Gallons
    ABV: 5.7%
    OG: 1.045
    FG: 1.002

    Grain Bill:
    Belgian Pilsner Malt (68%)
    Flaked Wheat (17%)
    Vienna malt (15%)


    Yeasts:
    WLP565/Wyeast 3724 at beginning of fermentation
    WLP644, 0.5 Liter Recommended, added to primary when beer/wort reaches gravity of 1.033
     
    #1 VikeMan, Feb 10, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 10, 2015
  2. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    Sheer laziness. Single infusion, no mashout.
     
    ChrisMyhre and Slatetank like this.
  3. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    So I am clear on terminology...

    Sacc rest plus mashout would be something like 150 for 60 mins then sparge to get the mash up to 168, right.

    While protein rest, sacc rest plus mashout would be something like 130 to 150 to 168, right?

    Does anyone not do a mashout as I understand it (i.e. sparge water or similar to raise the mash to 165-170)? BIAB maybe?

    In the sidebar, there was a discussion about protein rests. I have never done one before, what would be the benefits for this beer of doing a protein rest? I personally don't care about clarity.
     
  4. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    You are clear on the terminology.
     
    wspscott likes this.
  5. PortLargo

    PortLargo Pooh-Bah (1,831) Oct 19, 2012 Florida
    Pooh-Bah

    A large percentage of unmodified malts would add long chain proteins that likely will produce haze. A protein rest reduces the long chains to medium chains; improves clarity and head stability. Palmer says usually not needed if unmodified malts are <25% which we are just below. Here's his take on the subject. More of the science of step mashing from BYO here.

    I give my witbiers a protein rest, they usually have 20 - 25% flaked wheat and have been pleased. Like you I favor mash-outs, but others skip this step. My equipment allows for a three temperature steps (if I get up early enough) so it's not unusual for me to go full court press.
     
    wspscott likes this.
  6. epic1856

    epic1856 Initiate (0) Aug 11, 2006 California

    Sacch rest plus mashout since I started batch sparging, but I have no complaints doing sacch rest only too. I'll be happy with either one.
     
  7. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    So, what would a protein rest lead to in a beer with "brett"? Suppose we were using 645 instead of 644, would a protein rest be good or bad by what ever definitions of good/bad you prefer?
     
  8. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    I chose single infusion with no mash out.
    Single infusion because I think that is all you need for this style and grain bill.
    No mash out because I want the most fermentable wort possible. The purpose of a mash out is to halt enzyme activity. If you don't mash out then the enzyme activity will continue through sparge and collection. Plus with some set ups and processes you risk adding some astringency if your water is too hot.
     
    dmtaylor and jbakajust1 like this.
  9. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Protein rest is detrimental. Mashout is usually worthless, but especially for saison where you want a little added dryness. Just do a single infusion and be done.
     
    GUNSLINGER and Naugled like this.
  10. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    I batch sparge, usually only adding a small amount of sparge water to first runoff. It likely does not get heated to mash out temps. The second runnings would be closer .

    I also don't worry about clarity much. It's lovely when you get it, desirable when your competing, and completely lacking in importance to my taste buds.
     
    wspscott and jbakajust1 like this.
  11. epic1856

    epic1856 Initiate (0) Aug 11, 2006 California

    Whats happens if this ends up in a tie? We can't just split it down the middle.
     
  12. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Do what's right. Skip the protein rest. Have ya'll experimented with protein rests? If you haven't, then you don't know why you're doing one and should skip it. Protein rest results in a clearer beer, but in my experience this comes at the expense of thinner more watery body and poor head retention. If you don't want any weird side effects, then skip it.
     
  13. scurvy311

    scurvy311 Savant (1,135) Dec 3, 2005 Louisiana

    To suggest that because a person hasn't experimented with a concept/activity, they shouldn't do it is a little short sided. Don't get me wrong, I think I understand why you are saying that, but in home brewing context, it seems like that would limit the hobby. I understand things about brewing that I've never experimented with also. I've never experimented with brewing on a $3000 full blown system and would not know much about it, and if given the opportunity, I would not "skip it".
     
  14. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    I'll switch my vote to help ensure we don't end up in a tie, I have no strong feelings about doing/not doing a mashout.
     
  15. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    I've never done a step mash at 85 minutes at 141 F, 62 minutes at 143 F, 47 minutes at 144 F, 3 minutes at 147 F, and 55 minutes at 155 F, but I know enough to recognize that it's needlessly adding extra steps, and for the purposes of putting out an averagely perfect recipe, if I have never tried such a mash schedule then I'm not going to recommend it. Now, if someone wants to try this on their own and not adhere to the averagely perfect recipe, by all means, I applaud those who wish to experiment. If you want to run the experiment on a $3000 full blow system, by all means please do it. But for the express purposes of recommending to everyone that they do these things, I'm going to stick with just a single infusion, and especially so considering that in my experience, the protein rest doesn't buy you anything for a saison and is generally detrimental.
     
  16. scurvy311

    scurvy311 Savant (1,135) Dec 3, 2005 Louisiana

    I didn't necessarily disagree with your reasons. It's just that your statement is so absolute.
     
  17. mugs1789

    mugs1789 Zealot (611) Dec 6, 2005 Maryland

    I'm confused. Does "single infusion (saccherification rest)" mean taking first runnings, only? That can't be what you mean....
     
  18. JohnSnowNW

    JohnSnowNW Initiate (0) Feb 6, 2013 Minnesota

    Nope. It means holding a certain temp for the entirety of the mash.
     
  19. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    My apologies. Chalk it up to a personality disorder.
     
    scurvy311 likes this.
  20. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    Ok, I am confused that there is such strong support for sacc rest, no mash out. You all are just sparging with ~150 degree water? If you are heating sparge water, why not heat it a little more (mash out temps)? Or are you mashing with your full volume of water like BIAB?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.