Beer rating activity

Talk Discussion in 'BeerAdvocate Talk' started by Stevedore, Dec 19, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stevedore

    Stevedore Grand Pooh-Bah (5,096) Nov 16, 2012 Oregon
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I'm curious to know what the trend has been with BA member activity as far as rating beers and adding new beers to the database.

    Myself and a few others in our tasting group been finding lately that many beers that we come across (together or otherwise), particularly locally in Wisconsin, need to be added when we come to BA to add our ratings and reviews. We know from other avenues (Untappd, word of mouth, etc.) that these beers are very popular amongst the local craft beer nerds- as an example, K'paui from Bent Kettle in WI- really popular coconut porter locally, but relatively few ratings, and even fewer reviews. Could just be that local Madison, WI beer nerds aren't on BA or don't care to contribute on BA. And we have a lot of them here.

    Even when I travel though, I find that a lot of the locally popular beers only have a handful of ratings that belie all the chatter that goes on within the local craft beer nerd circles. I'll posit an anecdotal example- I was lucky enough to take a long weekend trip to Denver recently and visit a few friends, including bottlesharing with fellow beer nerds who I know from BA; beers such as Weldwerks Barrel-Aged Mexican Achromatic (BAMA) and various Casey beers that make their rounds on the ISO:FT forums here and elsewhere, simply don't have very many reviews, or even ratings. For all the activity involving BAMA on regional trading forums elsewhere, it only has 5 reviews and 42 ratings. Casey Leaner, arguably more well-known nationally, has only 12 reviews and 58 ratings. Maybe that's a Colorado phenomenon- they are swimming in so much good beer, after all. And we have it pretty good here in Wisconsin.

    I just feel like there is a mismatch between the beer adding+rating+reviewing activity on here compared to all the chatter and activity elsewhere regarding different beers. Maybe it's just anecdotal but my specific questions are as follows:

    1) Is this all just in my head, and what is the objective data (presumably only accessible to administrators) saying regarding member activity in this particular realm on BA relative to active accounts? If that can't be divulged, that's fine.
    2) If there is a relative decrease in participation, why is that?
    3) And if so, what can we do to improve participation? BA has been a great resource not just for trading, but for finding out more information about beers, local and otherwise. I can't help but feel that while I keep contributing (and am happy to do so), it's easy to think that this level of participation is declining even as new accounts increase. Part of what makes a community a community is that everyone gives as much if not more than what they take from it, IMO.

    Thanks for reading. Grote dorst!
     
  2. HorseheadsHophead

    HorseheadsHophead Grand Pooh-Bah (3,732) Sep 15, 2014 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I don't know. I've been a member of BA for over a year now, and I've added three beers in just the past few months, despite never having done so in my first year.
     
    Harrison8 likes this.
  3. zizouandyuki

    zizouandyuki Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2015 Texas

    I believe the ratings here are far more reliable than elsewhere, but to your point, participation here is severely less than other sites like Untappd.

    I think it comes down to the user experience for submitting ratings. It's a process to complete a rating on here from a mobile device. With other sites, there's a mobile app built just for that feature alone.

    I like that more input is required to complete ratings here or to submit a new beer. I feel like this prevents people from rating without putting much thought into why the beer was so great or so poor; however, it's also a chore compared to the simplicity of other apps and probably wards off many from regularly reviewing/rating.

    I think a mobile app for ratings alone would greatly improve participation around here. If the app had a good UI/UX, I would abandon others in a heartbeat.
     
    couellette26 likes this.
  4. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    There was a conscious decision on the part of the site owners that ratings only do not improve the quality of the information provided by the site so they seem to have no desire or motivation to create such an app. See the links in my post below.
     
  5. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    This post is probably an example of "be careful what you ask for, you might get it."

    1) I don't think it's all in your head and there seem to be some objective data. See the links in my post below.
    2) I suspect there is a relative decrease, but it may not be bad and would appear to be related to reasons discussed in the links below.
    3) Your idea of what makes a community is much the same as mine but I've not thought much about whether any decline is a good thing or a bad thing. Not all participation requires (or has required) the same type or level of thinking that says we contribute as well as take. However, I do think it is important for all of us to reconsider once in a while the extent to which we are giving back as well as taking.
     
    #5 drtth, Dec 19, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
  6. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    As a general note to folks with an interest in the issues raised by the OP there is some history about how and why the owners have made certain choices in how this site operates. The site's current incarnation can be better understood from these two threads created some months ago. (Note there is some overlap between the two threads but both clearly articulate why some things are as they presently are.)

    https://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/beeradvocate-returns-to-its-roots-part-two.313997/

    https://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/beeradvocate-returns-to-its-roots-part-two.313997/

    In addition there was an extended site user discussion of the effects of certain changes to be found here:

    https://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/thoughts-on-the-latest-updates-top-250-etc.315702/

    In this last thread there are both some interesting discussions (at least they were to me :slight_smile:) which included some outstanding contributions by one particular site user, @pagriley who has the background knowledge and skills to both find and make use of some of the data that were/are out there and available to be found and analyzed.

    It is a very long read and contains a wealth of useful information for those who are interested or just curious. But it is also long enough (22 pages) you'll need a bit of time to get all the way through from start to finish.
     
    #6 drtth, Dec 19, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
    champ103 and F2brewers like this.
  7. zizouandyuki

    zizouandyuki Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2015 Texas

    That's a shame. Hope the brothers reconsider... there's a lot of opportunity here.

    As Benjamin Franklin once wrote: "When you're finished changing, you're finished."
     
  8. drtth

    drtth Initiate (0) Nov 25, 2007 Pennsylvania
    In Memoriam

    Oh I'd not say they are done changing given how many changes they have tried over the last 7-8 years. :slight_smile:

    Rather, I'd say that it's a case of there being certain changes that they don't seem to be interested in making, in part because some of those things have already been tried and found wanting when it comes to their long range goals for why this site exists at all.
     
    zizouandyuki likes this.
  9. Todd

    Todd Founder (13,518) Aug 23, 1996 Finland
    STAFF Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah

    Nearly 55,000 beers were added in 2015, with over 52,000 in 2016 so far.
    1. There are more beers being produced now than ever before.
    2. Not everyone enters new beers.
    3. Adding beers and places (and pics) could be easier.
    Our overall activity has increased consistently every year for two decades, however, we do have less tickers, who tend to enter everything (right or wrong) that they come across elsewhere. That's OK with us, but we do have less ratings (no text) as a result.

    And although most users who used the app eventually came back to use the site, we did lose some users over killing the app. We also saw a slight dip in participation when Beer Karma was pulled, but this leveled off soon after.

    Regardless, our overall user numbers are up, as are reviews and their quality.
    Make the entire experience easier and the data more useful, which are just some of the goals with BA 4.0.
     
  10. Todd

    Todd Founder (13,518) Aug 23, 1996 Finland
    STAFF Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah

    Stick around. We've been constantly changing since 1996 and have no plans of becoming stagnant as a company.
     
  11. zizouandyuki

    zizouandyuki Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2015 Texas

    Looking forward to seeing what's in store for 4.0. Is there thread somewhere that discusses the enhancements?
     
  12. Todd

    Todd Founder (13,518) Aug 23, 1996 Finland
    STAFF Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah

    cryptichead and zizouandyuki like this.
  13. AZBeerDude72

    AZBeerDude72 Initiate (0) Jun 10, 2016 Arizona

    As someone who has been around for a short time now I really enjoy everything. I am sure like any site things change and adapt and grow. But from my humble view I feel like the list of beers is fantastic and growing. I know I try and review most beers I consume and also add them into database if missing. I actually enjoy PC based version over any app. I never liked the app since my phone was horrible to type on so honestly the PC is the only way I go with adding items and pics, etc.
    Keep up the good work BA!!!
    :sunglasses:
     
    #13 AZBeerDude72, Dec 19, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
  14. bgold86

    bgold86 Pooh-Bah (1,836) Apr 1, 2015 New York
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I have also noticed a decrease in member participation and contribute to the discontinuance of beer karma as well as the popularity of untapped.
     
  15. Todd

    Todd Founder (13,518) Aug 23, 1996 Finland
    STAFF Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah

    For the record, overall there's no decrease in member participation and neither of those are contributing factors. And, as stated, ticking is down as we intentionally made changes against it.
     
    Harrison8 likes this.
  16. Harrison8

    Harrison8 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,285) Dec 6, 2015 Missouri
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    There was a general consensus that the new Beer Karma system should weight reviews heavier then ratings, which could help produce more reviews for beers.

    There were also quite a few folks in that thread upset with how others will post a new beer, but not provide a rating or review. While it is frustrating, and could stem from bad site behavior, it was also pointed out that the beer could have been added initially when the beer was announced, but not available for drinking.

    Still, those don't explain everything. Personally, I am satisfied with our current system. Even as is, we still get some crum-bum reviews that might as well be 140 character tweets (i.e. they hit the minimum word count, with vague descriptors, and call it good).
     
    rodbeermunch and mudbug like this.
  17. Wasatch

    Wasatch Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,050) Jun 8, 2005 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I review all the brew's I drink, and I will add new brew's if needed.

    Cheers!
     
    BEER88, Bitterbill, JohnGalt1 and 5 others like this.
  18. zizouandyuki

    zizouandyuki Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2015 Texas

    Good god, man. Just checked to see if you were exaggerating... nope. Well done!
     
    Wasatch likes this.
  19. Sound_Explorer

    Sound_Explorer Grand Pooh-Bah (3,044) Dec 29, 2013 Washington
    Pooh-Bah

    I oddly like adding new beers or places on here. Gives me a bigger sense of contributing to the community. I prefer BA over Untapped for reasons I won't get into here.

    I myself will sometimes hold off on adding a beer or what have you, depending on my situation such as being at a brewers night or festival, then add it at a later time. I would like to see a return of an app but the website is working alright, still needs some tweaks to become more streamlined and easier to use.

    I would like the karma to come back but it's not a deal breaker (obviously). I don't think people should drink to get badges or whatnot but it was something that wasn't pushing people to drink, it was a way to see my history with BA and beer in general.

    I would say usage is not growing as fast as it once was at least with those I talk to. Most people I talk to use Untapped rather than BA because of the popularity and social aspects. Even have a local beer bar that now uses Untapped for their online and in-house tap-list on their TV's.
     
    Harrison8 likes this.
  20. Todd

    Todd Founder (13,518) Aug 23, 1996 Finland
    STAFF Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah

    Which, as I already explained, is not the case. Again, the site has seen nothing but overall growth each year for two decades. Our continued growth is one of the reasons why we recently invested in a new hosting infrastructure.

    Anyway. Due to the context of this thread, most are only thinking about the site in terms of beers and ratings. That's just a part of a very large site, that's also much more than just a site.
     
    Wasatch and AZBeerDude72 like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.