Man's Best Friend
Thirsty Dog Brewing Company

- From:
- Thirsty Dog Brewing Company
- Ohio, United States
- Style:
- American Lager
- ABV:
- Not listed
- Score:
- +5 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.24 | pDev: 7.59%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 5
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jul 11, 2004
- Added:
- Nov 08, 2001
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Ricochet from Ohio
2.1/5 rDev -6.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2
2.1/5 rDev -6.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2
Took the taste test..at .50 per sample. $$$ well spent.
This is the one I really did not want to try, figuring it would be the same as what I have at home, average beers are not what I go to brewpubs for.
It appeared lighter than most American Lagers and had little if any scent. It is weak in mouthfeel and went down like it was water. I would like to compare this with Rolling Rock but while RR goes so easy and with slight aftertaste, I could not finish this sample. It was a little higher in quality than the macros, but taste was just not there. I'll pass.
Jul 11, 2004This is the one I really did not want to try, figuring it would be the same as what I have at home, average beers are not what I go to brewpubs for.
It appeared lighter than most American Lagers and had little if any scent. It is weak in mouthfeel and went down like it was water. I would like to compare this with Rolling Rock but while RR goes so easy and with slight aftertaste, I could not finish this sample. It was a little higher in quality than the macros, but taste was just not there. I'll pass.
Reviewed by beergeek279 from Pennsylvania
2.33/5 rDev +4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
2.33/5 rDev +4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
Served as a sample at Thirsty Dog in Akron. The color was golden, with a slight ring of head. The smell was very slight malt. The taste was very light malt with some adjuncting tastes. Mouthfeel was average. As for drinkability, with so many more interesting beers here, not sure that I'd have another one of these.
I don't really see the point of this one, as they had Bud and Bud Light on tap in Akron. Not exactly a great beer, but I'm sure macro lovers would drink it.
Mar 15, 2004I don't really see the point of this one, as they had Bud and Bud Light on tap in Akron. Not exactly a great beer, but I'm sure macro lovers would drink it.
Reviewed by AtLagerHeads from Ohio
2.46/5 rDev +9.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.46/5 rDev +9.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
A good offering for patrons looking for a typical American pale lager. The nose is of grain and the look is gold with a white head and decent lacing. There is a substantial body for the style and it is defintely BTB. Very bready on the palate with just enough hops added to cut the sweetness a tad. Good macro-like brew that improves on the macro approach.
Apr 11, 2003Reviewed by Dogbrick from Ohio
2.3/5 rDev +2.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
2.3/5 rDev +2.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
Light and smooth, but not much flavor. Typical American Lager attributes. I guess they have to try to cater to the American Macro crowd who is feeling daring. Thirsty Dog has better beers than this to try.
Sep 17, 2002Reviewed by Brent from Kentucky
2/5 rDev -10.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
2/5 rDev -10.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
If this is man's best friend, I'd hate to meet our enemy. Water, water, water. Light, bland and pretty flavorless. I guess the brewpub needed a craft beer for the Bud Light crowd.
Nov 08, 2001
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!